Relative abundance of the top 20 bacterial families in Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans samples from different study sites. (CP = Cx. pipiens, CR = Cx. restuans, Agric = Agriculture, BW = Busey Wood, WP = Weaver Park, SF = South Farms, CW = Collins Woods, TW = Trelease Woods, and BF = Brownfield Woods). Results were generated using reverse primer reads. (TIF 72 kb
Figure S2. Rarefaction curves. Rarefaction curves calculated for each sample based on the OTU comput...
Table S1. Identification of bacterial genera that are differentially abundant in pairwise comparison...
Table S1. Frequency of different bacterial OTUs in mosquito samples. (XLSX 11 kb
Relative abundance of the top 20 bacterial OTUs in Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans samples from differe...
GPS coordinates for the nine study sites and the number of Culex spp. mosquitoes collected from each...
Taxonomy of bacterial OTUs that were shared between Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans or were unique to e...
Biodiversity (Shannon, evenness) and richness estimators of Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans microbiota ...
Figure S1. Alpha diversity. Box plots of bacterial species richness associated with the nine mosquit...
Figure S3. Family level composition (% of OTUs) in different organs of nine mosquito species. Only O...
Table S3. Pairwise ANOSIM comparisons of sample groups. Only 12 pairwise comparisons (in bold) remai...
Table S1. Tukey’s post-hoc test outputs from larval bacterial microbiota. Linear models were used to...
Table S1. Percentage of phyla OTUs in the reproductive organs (A) salivary glands (B) and guts (C). ...
Table S4. SIMPER analysis results showing differential abundance of bacterial OTUs among mosquito sp...
Figure S2. The midgut bacterial communities are highly structured by sequencing run. The cluster den...
Non-metric multidimensional scaling 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination of the most ab...
Figure S2. Rarefaction curves. Rarefaction curves calculated for each sample based on the OTU comput...
Table S1. Identification of bacterial genera that are differentially abundant in pairwise comparison...
Table S1. Frequency of different bacterial OTUs in mosquito samples. (XLSX 11 kb
Relative abundance of the top 20 bacterial OTUs in Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans samples from differe...
GPS coordinates for the nine study sites and the number of Culex spp. mosquitoes collected from each...
Taxonomy of bacterial OTUs that were shared between Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans or were unique to e...
Biodiversity (Shannon, evenness) and richness estimators of Cx. pipiens and Cx. restuans microbiota ...
Figure S1. Alpha diversity. Box plots of bacterial species richness associated with the nine mosquit...
Figure S3. Family level composition (% of OTUs) in different organs of nine mosquito species. Only O...
Table S3. Pairwise ANOSIM comparisons of sample groups. Only 12 pairwise comparisons (in bold) remai...
Table S1. Tukey’s post-hoc test outputs from larval bacterial microbiota. Linear models were used to...
Table S1. Percentage of phyla OTUs in the reproductive organs (A) salivary glands (B) and guts (C). ...
Table S4. SIMPER analysis results showing differential abundance of bacterial OTUs among mosquito sp...
Figure S2. The midgut bacterial communities are highly structured by sequencing run. The cluster den...
Non-metric multidimensional scaling 2. Non-metric multidimensional scaling ordination of the most ab...
Figure S2. Rarefaction curves. Rarefaction curves calculated for each sample based on the OTU comput...
Table S1. Identification of bacterial genera that are differentially abundant in pairwise comparison...
Table S1. Frequency of different bacterial OTUs in mosquito samples. (XLSX 11 kb