<p>Differences in (A) body weight (n = 5 in NPD group, n = 10 in LPD group), (B) % fat mass, (C) % lean mass, and (D) serum urea concentrations between NPD-fed and LPD-fed mice. (E) Fecal urea and (F) fecal ammonia levels at baseline on the NPD and after placement on the LPD. Values represent mean ± SEM. Statistical significance in body weight determined by two-way ANOVA with repeated measures; statistical significance in other parameters determined by paired and unpaired two-tailed Student’s t test. *p<0.05, **p<0.01, ***p<0.001.</p
<p><b>(A)</b> Caloric intake was assessed at various time points of MnTBAP treatment in mice previou...
<p>Values are presented as group mean ± SEM. Rel. = relative. LBM = lean body mass. Statistical ...
Mice fed HFD or LFD for 10 weeks (n = 6/ group) were imaged in stationary, ventral orientation (abdo...
<p>Body weight, liver weight, and biochemical variables in control and high fat diet (HFD) fed mice ...
(A) Body weights of female mice fed the RC (dotted line, n = 5), LFD (dashed line, n = 5), or HFD (s...
<p>(A) Experimental scheme: Mice were given each diet post weaning. The first four weeks post weanin...
<p>Statistically significant difference between the groups are shown in the comments.</p
<p>(A) The weight gain of TRPV1+/+ (solid symbols) and TRPV1-/- (open symbols) mice fed either a sta...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to compare differences among the groups of LLC-...
<p>(A) Individual measurements of food intake over a 48 hour period for individual mice divided by 2...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA was performed to test for differences among the groups. Values are means ± SEM (n ...
<p>Body weight (A) and food intake (B). Glycemia and insulinemia in overnight fasted (C and E) or fe...
<p>Body weight, adipose tissue weight and metabolic profile of female C57BL/6J mice fed ND or HFD fo...
<p>Whereas cumulative food intake (A) did not differ (mean ± SD), <i>ad libitum</i> fed C57BL/6J mic...
<p>Mean ± SEM for (A) body weight, (B) food intake over 24 hrs prior to lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 1 m...
<p><b>(A)</b> Caloric intake was assessed at various time points of MnTBAP treatment in mice previou...
<p>Values are presented as group mean ± SEM. Rel. = relative. LBM = lean body mass. Statistical ...
Mice fed HFD or LFD for 10 weeks (n = 6/ group) were imaged in stationary, ventral orientation (abdo...
<p>Body weight, liver weight, and biochemical variables in control and high fat diet (HFD) fed mice ...
(A) Body weights of female mice fed the RC (dotted line, n = 5), LFD (dashed line, n = 5), or HFD (s...
<p>(A) Experimental scheme: Mice were given each diet post weaning. The first four weeks post weanin...
<p>Statistically significant difference between the groups are shown in the comments.</p
<p>(A) The weight gain of TRPV1+/+ (solid symbols) and TRPV1-/- (open symbols) mice fed either a sta...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to compare differences among the groups of LLC-...
<p>(A) Individual measurements of food intake over a 48 hour period for individual mice divided by 2...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA was performed to test for differences among the groups. Values are means ± SEM (n ...
<p>Body weight (A) and food intake (B). Glycemia and insulinemia in overnight fasted (C and E) or fe...
<p>Body weight, adipose tissue weight and metabolic profile of female C57BL/6J mice fed ND or HFD fo...
<p>Whereas cumulative food intake (A) did not differ (mean ± SD), <i>ad libitum</i> fed C57BL/6J mic...
<p>Mean ± SEM for (A) body weight, (B) food intake over 24 hrs prior to lipopolysaccharide (LPS; 1 m...
<p><b>(A)</b> Caloric intake was assessed at various time points of MnTBAP treatment in mice previou...
<p>Values are presented as group mean ± SEM. Rel. = relative. LBM = lean body mass. Statistical ...
Mice fed HFD or LFD for 10 weeks (n = 6/ group) were imaged in stationary, ventral orientation (abdo...