1<p>Two-way ANOVA was performed to test for differences among the groups. Values are means ± SEM (n = 22 per group for PAI-1<sup>−/−</sup> mice, n = 28 per group for wild-type mice or n = 6 per group for caloric intake). AIN WT: AIN93G-fed wild-type mice, AIN PAI-1<sup>−/−</sup>: AIN93G-fed PAI-1<sup>−/−</sup> mice, HF WT: high-fat fed wild-type mice, HF PAI-1<sup>−/−</sup>: high-fat fed PAI-1<sup>−/−</sup> mice.</p><p>Body fat mass ratio, lean mass ratio, absolute lean mass weight and caloric intake of mice<sup><a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0110869#nt103" target="_blank">1</a></sup>.</p
<p>ANOVA of body mass gain after 18 weeks did not show any genotype difference. B) Mean body masses ...
<p>Numbers highlighted in bold represent p < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA. Values indicated by highli...
<p>(A) Body weight of male mice. (B) Body weight of female mice. (C) Average daily food intake. (D) ...
<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to test for differences among the groups. The hi...
<p>A) Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant increase in body weight in <i>ob/ob</i> mice; F(1;1...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to compare differences among the groups of LLC-...
<p>Body mass and fat mass for normal diet (ND) and high-fat diet (HFD) mice throughout diet interven...
<p>Bodyweight was measured weekly in all three dietary interventions. Each data point represents the...
<p>Values are presented as group mean ± SEM. Rel. = relative. LBM = lean body mass. Statistical ...
<p>(A) Average daily food intake per mouse over the 3 week high fat feeding trial (WT; n = 15, iMGL;...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). The statistical analysis of one-way analysis of varian...
<p>Data are mean ± sem, n = 12/group.</p>*<p>p<0.05 vs. L-P/C-HF group. BW, body weight. EI, energy ...
<p>All data mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice.</p><p>Mean body weight, lean body mass, fat mass and percent ...
<p>Growth curves of 4–12 week-old-mice (A) together with epididymal (EWAT), subcutaneous (SCWAT) and...
<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to test for differences among the groups. Values...
<p>ANOVA of body mass gain after 18 weeks did not show any genotype difference. B) Mean body masses ...
<p>Numbers highlighted in bold represent p < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA. Values indicated by highli...
<p>(A) Body weight of male mice. (B) Body weight of female mice. (C) Average daily food intake. (D) ...
<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to test for differences among the groups. The hi...
<p>A) Repeated measures ANOVA showed significant increase in body weight in <i>ob/ob</i> mice; F(1;1...
1<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to compare differences among the groups of LLC-...
<p>Body mass and fat mass for normal diet (ND) and high-fat diet (HFD) mice throughout diet interven...
<p>Bodyweight was measured weekly in all three dietary interventions. Each data point represents the...
<p>Values are presented as group mean ± SEM. Rel. = relative. LBM = lean body mass. Statistical ...
<p>(A) Average daily food intake per mouse over the 3 week high fat feeding trial (WT; n = 15, iMGL;...
<p>Data are presented as mean ± SEM (n = 10). The statistical analysis of one-way analysis of varian...
<p>Data are mean ± sem, n = 12/group.</p>*<p>p<0.05 vs. L-P/C-HF group. BW, body weight. EI, energy ...
<p>All data mean ± SEM for n = 8 mice.</p><p>Mean body weight, lean body mass, fat mass and percent ...
<p>Growth curves of 4–12 week-old-mice (A) together with epididymal (EWAT), subcutaneous (SCWAT) and...
<p>Two-way ANOVA and Tukey contrasts were performed to test for differences among the groups. Values...
<p>ANOVA of body mass gain after 18 weeks did not show any genotype difference. B) Mean body masses ...
<p>Numbers highlighted in bold represent p < 0.05 as determined by ANOVA. Values indicated by highli...
<p>(A) Body weight of male mice. (B) Body weight of female mice. (C) Average daily food intake. (D) ...