<p>The comparison histograms of Mean sAUC for six different models in Toronto database.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
<p>Comparison between the means and standard deviations of the urban perception recorded for each ci...
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
Comparison of variable selection results of different models for Brithwt dataset.</p
<p>Statistical comparison between histograms of cluster sizes for the different strains.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>Tree comparing the 33 bidimensional histograms based on index <i>d<sub>ij</sub></i>.</p
<p>Comparison of the average level of socioeconomic features among clusters in Boston.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 1 with different classifiers.</p
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 2 with different classifiers.</p
Pairwise mean comparison of Student t-statistic of IRV scores of 6 groups of 133 species tested.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in training the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
<p>Comparison between the means and standard deviations of the urban perception recorded for each ci...
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
Comparison of variable selection results of different models for Brithwt dataset.</p
<p>Statistical comparison between histograms of cluster sizes for the different strains.</p
<p>Comparison of the measurements between the three models, for each measurement.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in testing the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
<p>Tree comparing the 33 bidimensional histograms based on index <i>d<sub>ij</sub></i>.</p
<p>Comparison of the average level of socioeconomic features among clusters in Boston.</p
Comparison of the average correct answer positions among different model setups.</p
<p>Comparison of the estimated PIC values calculated for the two different marker systems, TBP and S...
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 1 with different classifiers.</p
Comparison of classification accuracies of dataset 2 with different classifiers.</p
Pairwise mean comparison of Student t-statistic of IRV scores of 6 groups of 133 species tested.</p
<p>A Statistical model comparison in training the models when P = 105 and Q = 27.</p
Results of comparison of correctly predicted proportions of cases by the two models.</p
<p>Comparison between the means and standard deviations of the urban perception recorded for each ci...
The quantitative comparison of our approach with three related works for segmentation on the two dat...
DOI
Add to ORKG