<p><b>Panel A</b> shows the simulated power for the sex-stratified model, <b>Panel B</b> shows the power for the model without X-inactivation in females, and <b>Panel C</b> shows the power for the model with X-inactivation. The plots on the left-hand side display power simulations with increasing relative risks and varying sample sizes of case-parent triads, assuming a SNP minor allele frequency (MAF) of 0.2. The plots on the right-hand side show the simulated power with increasing relative risks and MAFs, assuming 600 case-parent triads in the study population (300 case-parent triads for the sex-stratified model). A significance level of 0.05 was used.</p
A) Single major allele calls; B) Double allele calls (DACs); C) Single minor allele calls; D) Missin...
<p>Power was computed using TDT Power Calculator <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10...
<p>A-D, KW, MLM and LM. The “Power” was defined as the detection frequency in 500 repeats for a cert...
<p>(A) QQ plot of -log10 p values from SNP set tests using different SNP weights under the null simu...
<p>The plot shows the powers (y-axis) of each method over the different LD and MAF structures (x-axi...
<p>The plot shows the powers (y-axis) of each method over the different LD and MAF structures (x-axi...
<p>Power calculations are based on 684 cases and 710 controls with odds ratio ranging from 1.2–1.5 f...
<p>Left panel: Power versus relative risk ratio (RRR) for different sample sizes, minor allele frequ...
<p>Power estimates for BOMP, VT, SKAT, KBAC (KBAC1P = minor allele frequency defined as , KBAC5P = m...
<p>Data were simulated based on real data by random selection of 1, 5 or 10 genotyped SNPs at either...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
<p>The x-axis indicates the SNP numbers. In the top panel, the true heritabilities of small-effect S...
<p>(a) From our simulated case-control studies, we randomly-sampled markers in order to mimic the as...
Generally, larger sample size leads to a greater statistical power to detect a significant differenc...
A) Single major allele calls; B) Double allele calls (DACs); C) Single minor allele calls; D) Missin...
A) Single major allele calls; B) Double allele calls (DACs); C) Single minor allele calls; D) Missin...
<p>Power was computed using TDT Power Calculator <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10...
<p>A-D, KW, MLM and LM. The “Power” was defined as the detection frequency in 500 repeats for a cert...
<p>(A) QQ plot of -log10 p values from SNP set tests using different SNP weights under the null simu...
<p>The plot shows the powers (y-axis) of each method over the different LD and MAF structures (x-axi...
<p>The plot shows the powers (y-axis) of each method over the different LD and MAF structures (x-axi...
<p>Power calculations are based on 684 cases and 710 controls with odds ratio ranging from 1.2–1.5 f...
<p>Left panel: Power versus relative risk ratio (RRR) for different sample sizes, minor allele frequ...
<p>Power estimates for BOMP, VT, SKAT, KBAC (KBAC1P = minor allele frequency defined as , KBAC5P = m...
<p>Data were simulated based on real data by random selection of 1, 5 or 10 genotyped SNPs at either...
<p>The true positive rate (TPR, row 1), false discovery rate (FDR, row 2) and false positive rate (F...
<p>The x-axis indicates the SNP numbers. In the top panel, the true heritabilities of small-effect S...
<p>(a) From our simulated case-control studies, we randomly-sampled markers in order to mimic the as...
Generally, larger sample size leads to a greater statistical power to detect a significant differenc...
A) Single major allele calls; B) Double allele calls (DACs); C) Single minor allele calls; D) Missin...
A) Single major allele calls; B) Double allele calls (DACs); C) Single minor allele calls; D) Missin...
<p>Power was computed using TDT Power Calculator <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10...
<p>A-D, KW, MLM and LM. The “Power” was defined as the detection frequency in 500 repeats for a cert...