Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can provide valuable evidence of the efficacy of interventions if they are well-designed, appropriately executed, and adequately reported. Adequate reporting of methodology in surgical RCTs is known to be poor, and adverse-event reporting in surgical research is inconsistent. The Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement is a framework to help authors report their findings in a transparent manner. Extensions to the CONSORT statement have been published recently to address deficiencies in adverse-event reporting and in reporting of specific criteria related to nonpharmacologic treatments. The aim of this study was to assess the quality of reporting of trial metho...
AIM Abstracts of randomized clinical trials are extremely important as trial appraisal is often b...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of registered surgical trials with results published in journals...
Background: Journals are an important conduit for the publication of research. However, the reportin...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of surgical randomized controlled trials published i...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide clinicians with the best evidence for interventions, but...
BACKGROUND: Standardized reporting methods facilitate comparisons between studies. Reporting of data...
BACKGROUND: Standardized reporting methods facilitate comparisons between studies. Reporting of data...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic su...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to bias if they lack methodological qualit...
BACKGROUNDNo study has been conducted on the scientific quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT...
Background: In September 2005, scientific journals began requiring trial protocol registration to i...
Abstract Background Observational studies dominate th...
AIM Abstracts of randomized clinical trials are extremely important as trial appraisal is often b...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of registered surgical trials with results published in journals...
Background: Journals are an important conduit for the publication of research. However, the reportin...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of surgical randomized controlled trials published i...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide clinicians with the best evidence for interventions, but...
BACKGROUND: Standardized reporting methods facilitate comparisons between studies. Reporting of data...
BACKGROUND: Standardized reporting methods facilitate comparisons between studies. Reporting of data...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic su...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to bias if they lack methodological qualit...
BACKGROUNDNo study has been conducted on the scientific quality of randomized controlled trials (RCT...
Background: In September 2005, scientific journals began requiring trial protocol registration to i...
Abstract Background Observational studies dominate th...
AIM Abstracts of randomized clinical trials are extremely important as trial appraisal is often b...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the proportion of registered surgical trials with results published in journals...
Background: Journals are an important conduit for the publication of research. However, the reportin...