OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery, to identify factors associated with good reporting quality, and to assess the awareness of the Consolidated Standards for Reporting of Trials statement and ascertain the views of authors reporting randomized controlled trials on the difficulties in conducting randomized controlled trials and the possible ways to further improve the reporting quality of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surgery. METHODS: Randomized controlled trials of cardiothoracic surgery published in principal cardiothoracic and 4 general medical journals in 2003 were included. The quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials was assessed by usi...
Background Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Background: Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of surgical randomized controlled trials published i...
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can provide valuable evidence of the effi...
Objective: Surgeons have been criticised for not undertaking high-quality research. This study exami...
BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to bias if they lack methodological qualit...
Objective: To assess the number and quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
Purpose: To evaluate the reporting quality of key methodological items in randomized controlled tria...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide clinicians with the best evidence for interventions, but...
Background Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Background: Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
ObjectiveTo evaluate the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials in cardiothoracic surg...
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the quality of reporting of surgical randomized controlled trials published i...
Background: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in surgery can provide valuable evidence of the effi...
Objective: Surgeons have been criticised for not undertaking high-quality research. This study exami...
BackgroundRandomised controlled trials (RCTs) are subject to bias if they lack methodological qualit...
Objective: To assess the number and quality of the reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
OBJECTIVE: To assess the reporting of surgical interventions, care providers, and number of centers ...
Purpose: To evaluate the reporting quality of key methodological items in randomized controlled tria...
Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) provide clinicians with the best evidence for interventions, but...
Background Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Background: Reviews indicate that the quality of reporting of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) in...
Abstract Background Randomized controlled trials (RCT...