In 2004, the High Court of Australia had cause to revisit its 1996 decision in Kable, as well as to consider the nature of judicial power as it relates to the deprivation of liberty, outside of the parameters of conventional criminal sentencing. The resulting decisions of Fardon and Baker demonstrate the lack of constitutional protections afforded to people who become the focus of governmental campaigns to be "tough on crime". The so-called "Kable principle", as construed by the High Court in 2004, may prove to be the "constitutional watch dog that barks but once".<br /
Brown v. The Queen (Insanity) The M'Naughten Rules: The High Court and Uncontrollable Impulse pp. 69...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
This thesis examines the relationship between the rule of law and the Australian Constitution. Its m...
In the case of Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld), the High Court declared that preventive detention le...
Scholars of criminal law and criminalisation have paid insufficient attention to the use of constitu...
This article considers the impact of the High Court's findings in 'Kuczborski v Queensland ('Kuczbor...
The Kable principle is transforming Australian constitutional law. This article examines one aspect ...
The High Court's role of judicial review has often been examined for its impact on rights protection...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
The Kable doctrine is, and has always been, a difficult legal principle to define. For over a decade...
In the Behrooz case, the High Court held that Commonwealth legislation providing for detention of no...
This paper summarises the contentious issue of anti-gang legislation and whether it contravenes the ...
The paper considers the development of the Kable principle. In particular, it considers the High Cou...
This chapter explains how the High Court under former Chief Justice Mason in the early 1990s was wro...
© 2014 Dr. Elizabeth Eve Judith SouthwoodThe meaning of the "judicial power of the Commonwealth" und...
Brown v. The Queen (Insanity) The M'Naughten Rules: The High Court and Uncontrollable Impulse pp. 69...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
This thesis examines the relationship between the rule of law and the Australian Constitution. Its m...
In the case of Fardon v Attorney-General (Qld), the High Court declared that preventive detention le...
Scholars of criminal law and criminalisation have paid insufficient attention to the use of constitu...
This article considers the impact of the High Court's findings in 'Kuczborski v Queensland ('Kuczbor...
The Kable principle is transforming Australian constitutional law. This article examines one aspect ...
The High Court's role of judicial review has often been examined for its impact on rights protection...
The framers of the Australian Constitution entrenched the principle of separation of powers—specific...
The Kable doctrine is, and has always been, a difficult legal principle to define. For over a decade...
In the Behrooz case, the High Court held that Commonwealth legislation providing for detention of no...
This paper summarises the contentious issue of anti-gang legislation and whether it contravenes the ...
The paper considers the development of the Kable principle. In particular, it considers the High Cou...
This chapter explains how the High Court under former Chief Justice Mason in the early 1990s was wro...
© 2014 Dr. Elizabeth Eve Judith SouthwoodThe meaning of the "judicial power of the Commonwealth" und...
Brown v. The Queen (Insanity) The M'Naughten Rules: The High Court and Uncontrollable Impulse pp. 69...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
This thesis examines the relationship between the rule of law and the Australian Constitution. Its m...