With the Judgement No. 52/2016, the Italian Constitutional Court decided that there is no right to start the procedure to reach an agreement (intesa) with the State, as provided by article 8 of the Italian Constitution: according to the Constitutional Court the refusal to open the negotiations between the State and a religious (or atheistic) group involves a political Government responsibility in front of the Parliament, but it cannot be under scrutiny by the State Courts.The article aims at demonstrating that this judicial interpretation is not fully compatible with the ecclesiastical policy project as expressed in the Italian Constitutio
The goal of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of judgment no. 24414 of 2021 of the Joint ...
SOMMARIO: 1. Ulteriori riflessioni su un tema controverso - 2. Intese e procedimento amministrativo ...
ABSTRACT: The Constitutional Court, in its judgement, has brought to light the critical aspects of t...
With the Judgement No. 52/2016, the Italian Constitutional Court decided that there is no right to s...
This paper analyzes a recent decision of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning the possibility...
The judgement n. 52 of the year 2016 represents a turning point for the canon law. This judgement ne...
Di recente, con la sentenza n. 52 del 2016, la Corte costituzionale italiana ha preso posizione su u...
The paper, starting from the recent decision of Italian Constitutional Court no 52 /2016 which deni...
With judgment no. 52 of 2016, the Constitutional Court granted the \u201cconflict of powers\u201d ap...
This Article explores the recent approach of the Italian Constitutional Court regarding agreements b...
Nel caso UAAR - un’organizzazione ateistica, cui il Governo ha negato l’intesa con lo Stato - la Ca...
The constitutional models of the relationship between law and belief provided in Italy are crossed a...
SOMMARIO: 1. Il ruolo di Parlamento e Governo nella modifica del Concordato lateranense e nell’elabo...
The goal of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of judgment no. 24414 of 2021 of the Joint ...
SOMMARIO: 1. Ulteriori riflessioni su un tema controverso - 2. Intese e procedimento amministrativo ...
ABSTRACT: The Constitutional Court, in its judgement, has brought to light the critical aspects of t...
With the Judgement No. 52/2016, the Italian Constitutional Court decided that there is no right to s...
This paper analyzes a recent decision of the Italian Constitutional Court concerning the possibility...
The judgement n. 52 of the year 2016 represents a turning point for the canon law. This judgement ne...
Di recente, con la sentenza n. 52 del 2016, la Corte costituzionale italiana ha preso posizione su u...
The paper, starting from the recent decision of Italian Constitutional Court no 52 /2016 which deni...
With judgment no. 52 of 2016, the Constitutional Court granted the \u201cconflict of powers\u201d ap...
This Article explores the recent approach of the Italian Constitutional Court regarding agreements b...
Nel caso UAAR - un’organizzazione ateistica, cui il Governo ha negato l’intesa con lo Stato - la Ca...
The constitutional models of the relationship between law and belief provided in Italy are crossed a...
SOMMARIO: 1. Il ruolo di Parlamento e Governo nella modifica del Concordato lateranense e nell’elabo...
The goal of this paper is to provide a critical analysis of judgment no. 24414 of 2021 of the Joint ...
SOMMARIO: 1. Ulteriori riflessioni su un tema controverso - 2. Intese e procedimento amministrativo ...
ABSTRACT: The Constitutional Court, in its judgement, has brought to light the critical aspects of t...