The Double Jeopardy Clause does not protect a defendant from prosecution of any original charges when the defendant accepts a plea agreement for a lesser-included offense and then fails to comply with all the terms of the agreement. The Court ultimately determined that a defendant waives his double jeopardy rights when he pleads guilty and fails to comply with the remaining terms of the agreement
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Evans v. Michigan, in which the Court has a...
The Double Jeopardy Clause provides that no person will “be subject for the same offence to be twice...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the double jeopardy protections of Rule 1120(d) of the ...
Under Brunson, clear guidelines now exist for all parties involved in criminal trials regarding exac...
This article examines the effect of Oregon v. Kennedy on the Burger Court\u27s double jeopardy juris...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
When an arbitrator\u27s decision is adverse to one party, does the double jeopardy clause2 prohibit ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision holding the imposition of a state drug t...
THE FIFTH AMENDMENT prohibition against double jeopardy is designed to protect both federal and stat...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...
This commentary previews an upcoming Supreme Court case, Evans v. Michigan, in which the Court has a...
The Double Jeopardy Clause provides that no person will “be subject for the same offence to be twice...
A preview of two 1996 Supreme Court cases. In the first case, US v. Ursery, a convicted narcotics de...
In the landmark decision of United States v. DiFrancesco, the Supreme Court, in a five-to-four decis...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court has held that the double jeopardy protections of Rule 1120(d) of the ...
Under Brunson, clear guidelines now exist for all parties involved in criminal trials regarding exac...
This article examines the effect of Oregon v. Kennedy on the Burger Court\u27s double jeopardy juris...
Although founding its decision upon the present inapplicability of the double jeopardy clause to the...
When an arbitrator\u27s decision is adverse to one party, does the double jeopardy clause2 prohibit ...
This note examines the United States Supreme Court decision holding the imposition of a state drug t...
THE FIFTH AMENDMENT prohibition against double jeopardy is designed to protect both federal and stat...
The United States Supreme Court held that when relevant conduct is used to increase an accused\u27s ...
This Note argues that the application of the dual sovereignty doctrine to cases involving successive...
It is, therefore, important in any analysis of the Ashe decision to examine the policies and purpose...
Familiar to most Americans, the double jeopardy clause (the clause) of the Fifth Amendment to the Un...