I attempt to respond to the many questions and objections raised by the commentaries. The responses are grouped by themes, rather than focusing on the essays in sequence. So there are sections on worries about my analytical history, concerns about my meta-ethical perspective, doubts about my normative stance—and complaints about my perpetration of a ‘naturalistic fallacy’
A symposium to which one person contributes three extended papers is no unmixed pleasure for readers...
A précis of my book Pragmatist Quietism: A Meta-Ethical System (OUP, 2022); forthcoming in Analysis ...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
I attempt to respond to the many questions and objections raised by the commentaries. The responses ...
In this reply to my critics (Monika Bobako, Krzysztof Brzechczyn, Ewa Domańska, Juliusz Iwanicki, Av...
In this paper I review the comments, and reply to the objections, put forward in the commentaries to...
Before I respond to the four essays that have each offered valuable feedback on my Comprehensive Com...
I am immensely grateful to all the authors of these comments about my book Rationality Through Reas...
The tenor of the review's praise of what I have written, and the accuracy of its rendition of what I...
Abstract This is a response to the comments of Boghossian (Philos Stud, 2016. doi:10.1007/s11098-016...
In this article I reply to the comments of six philosophers on my book Authority and Estrangement: A...
The European Hobbes Society Online Colloquium featured my book, Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Powe...
Reading these excellent commentaries we already wish we had written another book – a more comprehens...
As we know, the Corpus Aristotelicumcontains three ethical works : the Nicomachean Ethics, the Eudem...
This paper responds to the contributions by Alexander Bird, Nathan Wildman, David Yates, Jennifer Mc...
A symposium to which one person contributes three extended papers is no unmixed pleasure for readers...
A précis of my book Pragmatist Quietism: A Meta-Ethical System (OUP, 2022); forthcoming in Analysis ...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...
I attempt to respond to the many questions and objections raised by the commentaries. The responses ...
In this reply to my critics (Monika Bobako, Krzysztof Brzechczyn, Ewa Domańska, Juliusz Iwanicki, Av...
In this paper I review the comments, and reply to the objections, put forward in the commentaries to...
Before I respond to the four essays that have each offered valuable feedback on my Comprehensive Com...
I am immensely grateful to all the authors of these comments about my book Rationality Through Reas...
The tenor of the review's praise of what I have written, and the accuracy of its rendition of what I...
Abstract This is a response to the comments of Boghossian (Philos Stud, 2016. doi:10.1007/s11098-016...
In this article I reply to the comments of six philosophers on my book Authority and Estrangement: A...
The European Hobbes Society Online Colloquium featured my book, Potentia: Hobbes and Spinoza on Powe...
Reading these excellent commentaries we already wish we had written another book – a more comprehens...
As we know, the Corpus Aristotelicumcontains three ethical works : the Nicomachean Ethics, the Eudem...
This paper responds to the contributions by Alexander Bird, Nathan Wildman, David Yates, Jennifer Mc...
A symposium to which one person contributes three extended papers is no unmixed pleasure for readers...
A précis of my book Pragmatist Quietism: A Meta-Ethical System (OUP, 2022); forthcoming in Analysis ...
I here respond to four SERRC commentators on my paper ‘Perspectivism, Deontologism and Epistemic Pov...