We challenge a line of thinking at the fore of recent work on epistemic value: the line (suggested by Kvanvig in The value of knowledge and the pursuit of understanding, 2003 and others) that if the value of knowledge is “swamped” by the value of mere true belief, then we have good reason to doubt its theoretical importance in epistemology. We offer a value-driven argument for the theoretical importance of knowledge—one that stands even if the value of knowledge is “swamped” by the value of true belief. Specifically, we contend that even if knowledge itself has no special epistemic value, its relationship to other items of value—cognitive abilities—gives ample reason to locate the concept at the very core of epistemolog
We are naturally inclined to judge that it is better to know that p than to merely truly believe tha...
ABSTRACT. This paper principally argues for two controversial theses: that understanding, unlike kno...
The paper addresses two fundamental issues in epistemic axiology. It argues primarily that curiosity...
We challenge a line of thinking at the fore of recent work on epistemic value: the line (suggested b...
ABSTRACT. It is argued that a popular way of accounting for the distinctive value of knowledge by ap...
Why care about knowledge? One of the questions that is very rarely asked in epistemology concerns wh...
I introduce and defend an argument against the popular view that anything falling short of knowledge...
A conspicuous oversight in recent debates about the vexed problem of the value of knowledge has been...
The value of knowledge has always been a central topic within epistemology. Going all the way back t...
Knowledge seems to be a good thing, or at least better than epistemic states that fall short of it, ...
The value problem in epistemology is to explain why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief...
In addition to purely practical values, there are cognitive values which figure in scientific delibe...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are mor...
It is my overall aim in this work to defend the view that knowledge is no more valuable than true be...
We are naturally inclined to judge that it is better to know that p than to merely truly believe tha...
ABSTRACT. This paper principally argues for two controversial theses: that understanding, unlike kno...
The paper addresses two fundamental issues in epistemic axiology. It argues primarily that curiosity...
We challenge a line of thinking at the fore of recent work on epistemic value: the line (suggested b...
ABSTRACT. It is argued that a popular way of accounting for the distinctive value of knowledge by ap...
Why care about knowledge? One of the questions that is very rarely asked in epistemology concerns wh...
I introduce and defend an argument against the popular view that anything falling short of knowledge...
A conspicuous oversight in recent debates about the vexed problem of the value of knowledge has been...
The value of knowledge has always been a central topic within epistemology. Going all the way back t...
Knowledge seems to be a good thing, or at least better than epistemic states that fall short of it, ...
The value problem in epistemology is to explain why knowledge is more valuable than mere true belief...
In addition to purely practical values, there are cognitive values which figure in scientific delibe...
The current literature on the value of knowledge is marred by two unwarranted presumptions, which to...
ABSTRACT: We argue that the so-called ‘Primary’ and ‘Secondary’ Value Problems for knowledge are mor...
It is my overall aim in this work to defend the view that knowledge is no more valuable than true be...
We are naturally inclined to judge that it is better to know that p than to merely truly believe tha...
ABSTRACT. This paper principally argues for two controversial theses: that understanding, unlike kno...
The paper addresses two fundamental issues in epistemic axiology. It argues primarily that curiosity...