Our commonsense understanding of meaning and motive is realized via the semantic encoding of causal role. Appreciating this together with other features of semantic theories enables us to see that methodological critiques of psychoanalysis, such as those by Popper and Grunbaum, systematically fail to take account of empirical data, and if taken seriously would render commonsense understanding of mind and language void. This is particularly problematic if we consider much of what we regard ourselves as knowing is registered in language, or understood through our use of it, since this includes science itself
Scientific methods of a particular field of knowledge can not be freely applied to a different field...
Discutindo a psicanálise, a partir de sua inserção na linguagem e nas Ciências Humanas, sobretudo ba...
At the beginning of the final lecture in Freud\u27s 1933 publication, New Introductory Lectures on P...
Our commonsense understanding of meaning and motive is realized via the semantic encoding of causal ...
Epistemology emerges from the study of the ways knowledge is gained in the different fields of scien...
Forthcoming in Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology Can psychoanalysis take its place in the scienc...
This paper briefly addresses questions of confirmation and disconfirmation in psychoanalysis. It ar...
The problem of intentionality is the problem of how some entities can be ‘about’ something...
It is proposed that the mental health crisis in “developed” societies is largely due to the fact tha...
While philosophers have worried about whether psychoanalysis is really a science, psychoanalysts hav...
This book discusses the two main construals of the explanatory goals of semantic theories. The first...
Is it science at all? Here are some of the things researchers have found out in their investigations...
Psychoanalytical methodology has been described as causal explanation or hermeneutic understanding. ...
Social constructivist approaches to science have often been dismissed as inaccurate accounts of scie...
This book discusses the two main construals of the explanatory goals of semantic theories. The first...
Scientific methods of a particular field of knowledge can not be freely applied to a different field...
Discutindo a psicanálise, a partir de sua inserção na linguagem e nas Ciências Humanas, sobretudo ba...
At the beginning of the final lecture in Freud\u27s 1933 publication, New Introductory Lectures on P...
Our commonsense understanding of meaning and motive is realized via the semantic encoding of causal ...
Epistemology emerges from the study of the ways knowledge is gained in the different fields of scien...
Forthcoming in Philosophy, Psychiatry and Psychology Can psychoanalysis take its place in the scienc...
This paper briefly addresses questions of confirmation and disconfirmation in psychoanalysis. It ar...
The problem of intentionality is the problem of how some entities can be ‘about’ something...
It is proposed that the mental health crisis in “developed” societies is largely due to the fact tha...
While philosophers have worried about whether psychoanalysis is really a science, psychoanalysts hav...
This book discusses the two main construals of the explanatory goals of semantic theories. The first...
Is it science at all? Here are some of the things researchers have found out in their investigations...
Psychoanalytical methodology has been described as causal explanation or hermeneutic understanding. ...
Social constructivist approaches to science have often been dismissed as inaccurate accounts of scie...
This book discusses the two main construals of the explanatory goals of semantic theories. The first...
Scientific methods of a particular field of knowledge can not be freely applied to a different field...
Discutindo a psicanálise, a partir de sua inserção na linguagem e nas Ciências Humanas, sobretudo ba...
At the beginning of the final lecture in Freud\u27s 1933 publication, New Introductory Lectures on P...