In Are Equal Liberty and Equality Compatible?, Jan Narveson and James Sterba insightfully debate whether a right to maximum equal negative liberty requires, or at least is compatible with, a right to welfare. Narveson argues that the two rights are incompatible, whereas Sterba argues that the rights are compatible and indeed that the right to maximum equal negative liberty requires a right to welfare. I argue that Sterba is correct that the two rights are conceptually compatible and that Narveson is right that right to negative liberty does not conceptually require a right to welfar
Cranston argued that scarcity makes universal welfare rights impossible. After showing that this arg...
In attempting to rectify the inequalities ensuing from the flaws of negative liberty, proponents of ...
Sometimes people ought to do something for the sake of equality but it would be wrong to force them ...
In Are Equal Liberty and Equality Compatible?, Jan Narveson and James Sterba insightfully debate whe...
Can individual liberty and social justice be reconciled? While libertarians have traditionally thoug...
Negative rights considered in the abstract aren’t very controversial. It seems prima facie plausible...
This article examines the libertarian arguments of Jan Narveson and James P. Sterba regarding the c...
I investigate the semantic and practical complexity of social rights, together with the obligations ...
This thesis is concerned with rights-based justifications for redistribution. Orthodox views are cri...
According to Kant, “right in a state of nature is called private right” (MS, AA VI, S. 242). It is m...
The human rights that are defended in libertarian literature tend to be limited in scope, which enta...
The Kaplow/Shavell thesis can be simply stated: If courts or legislatures pursue any value other tha...
The debate among libertarians and welfare advocates in contemporary literature revolves around the d...
Cullen, P. (2015). The negative and moral right to life: A basis for functional human rights. Confer...
The effect of Professor Michelman\u27s style of argument, which has quite a number of devotees on th...
Cranston argued that scarcity makes universal welfare rights impossible. After showing that this arg...
In attempting to rectify the inequalities ensuing from the flaws of negative liberty, proponents of ...
Sometimes people ought to do something for the sake of equality but it would be wrong to force them ...
In Are Equal Liberty and Equality Compatible?, Jan Narveson and James Sterba insightfully debate whe...
Can individual liberty and social justice be reconciled? While libertarians have traditionally thoug...
Negative rights considered in the abstract aren’t very controversial. It seems prima facie plausible...
This article examines the libertarian arguments of Jan Narveson and James P. Sterba regarding the c...
I investigate the semantic and practical complexity of social rights, together with the obligations ...
This thesis is concerned with rights-based justifications for redistribution. Orthodox views are cri...
According to Kant, “right in a state of nature is called private right” (MS, AA VI, S. 242). It is m...
The human rights that are defended in libertarian literature tend to be limited in scope, which enta...
The Kaplow/Shavell thesis can be simply stated: If courts or legislatures pursue any value other tha...
The debate among libertarians and welfare advocates in contemporary literature revolves around the d...
Cullen, P. (2015). The negative and moral right to life: A basis for functional human rights. Confer...
The effect of Professor Michelman\u27s style of argument, which has quite a number of devotees on th...
Cranston argued that scarcity makes universal welfare rights impossible. After showing that this arg...
In attempting to rectify the inequalities ensuing from the flaws of negative liberty, proponents of ...
Sometimes people ought to do something for the sake of equality but it would be wrong to force them ...