Add to ORKGIn this paper, I argue that neuroscience not only is not complemented, but rather is positively undermined, by the substantive commitments of materialist philosophers of mind. Thus, we can have neuroscience or "neurophilosophy" but not both. Since neuroscience is a real science, to the extent that it is in tension with materialistic neurophilosophy, the latter should be abandoned and the former retained
The first part of the paper offers an historical reconstruction of the relationship between philosop...
Work on consciousness by neurophilosophers often leaves a certain group of other philosophers frustr...
Philosophical critique can help clarify issues surrounding the burgeoning cognitive neurosciences an...
In this paper, I argue that neuroscience not only is not complemented, but rather is positively unde...
In this paper, I offer a new account of mind/body interaction that shows how it is possible for an i...
The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcom...
The picture of philosophy we obtain from contemporary naturalism is that of a kind of \u201cancilla...
The ground is shifting under the traditional approaches to problems in the philosophy of mind. Earli...
This chapter proposes neuro-psychoanalysis as reductionist and verificationist, and investigates why...
What is neurophilosophy? Different variants of connecting neuroscience and philosophy emerged in rec...
Abstract Scientific discoveries must have more impact on philosophy (Bechtel, 2001. Part. ...
Many neuroscientists and philosophers endorse a view about the explanatory reach of neuroscience (wh...
There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. D...
No Elimination, no Reduction, no Integration: Then What? Sciences of the Mind, Neuroscience and the ...
One of the main challenges of biology consists in articulating a coherent view of the central nervou...
The first part of the paper offers an historical reconstruction of the relationship between philosop...
Work on consciousness by neurophilosophers often leaves a certain group of other philosophers frustr...
Philosophical critique can help clarify issues surrounding the burgeoning cognitive neurosciences an...
In this paper, I argue that neuroscience not only is not complemented, but rather is positively unde...
In this paper, I offer a new account of mind/body interaction that shows how it is possible for an i...
The widespread use of brain imaging techniques encourages conceiving of neuroscience as the forthcom...
The picture of philosophy we obtain from contemporary naturalism is that of a kind of \u201cancilla...
The ground is shifting under the traditional approaches to problems in the philosophy of mind. Earli...
This chapter proposes neuro-psychoanalysis as reductionist and verificationist, and investigates why...
What is neurophilosophy? Different variants of connecting neuroscience and philosophy emerged in rec...
Abstract Scientific discoveries must have more impact on philosophy (Bechtel, 2001. Part. ...
Many neuroscientists and philosophers endorse a view about the explanatory reach of neuroscience (wh...
There is no controversy in psychology or brain sciences that brains create mind and consciousness. D...
No Elimination, no Reduction, no Integration: Then What? Sciences of the Mind, Neuroscience and the ...
One of the main challenges of biology consists in articulating a coherent view of the central nervou...
The first part of the paper offers an historical reconstruction of the relationship between philosop...
Work on consciousness by neurophilosophers often leaves a certain group of other philosophers frustr...
Philosophical critique can help clarify issues surrounding the burgeoning cognitive neurosciences an...