Despite the prevalence of human rights discourse, the very idea or concept of a human right remains obscure. In particular, it is unclear what is supposed to be special or distinctive about human rights. In this paper, we consider two recent attempts to answer this challenge, James Griffin’s “personhood account” and Charles Beitz’s “practice-based account”, and argue that neither is entirely satisfactory. We then conclude with a suggestion for what a more adequate account might look like – what we call the “structural pluralist account” of human rights
In a variety of disciplines, there exists a consensus that human rights are individual claim rights ...
In this contribution, I challenge Charles Beitz’ account of international human rights law within hi...
The idea of human rights is that they are assumed to derive from some innate feature that all humans...
Despite the prevalence of human rights discourse, the very idea or concept of a human right remains ...
The idea of human rights, although often discussed as if its meaning were self-evident, is, in reali...
What is distinctive about human rights, when compared with the rights claims associated with modern ...
In this paper I raise some questions about the familiar claim, recently reiterated by James Griffin,...
The discursive character of human rights prevents a precise summary of historical origin, rationale,...
What is and should be the scope of our appeals to human rights? To what desiderata should our theory...
AbstractThe historical progression of the idea of ‘Rights’ and ‘Citizenship’ are embedded in a narra...
In this chapter, I assume that human rights animate and underlie human rights practice, rather than ...
Human rights theory and practice have long been stuck in a rut. Although disagreement is the norm i...
Charles Beitz has presented us with a new and novel theory of human rights, one that is motivated by...
James Griffin’s book “On Human Rights” is a critical account of the global leading imposition of hum...
Human rights are the pervasive practical and political concept, discussed in various branches: polit...
In a variety of disciplines, there exists a consensus that human rights are individual claim rights ...
In this contribution, I challenge Charles Beitz’ account of international human rights law within hi...
The idea of human rights is that they are assumed to derive from some innate feature that all humans...
Despite the prevalence of human rights discourse, the very idea or concept of a human right remains ...
The idea of human rights, although often discussed as if its meaning were self-evident, is, in reali...
What is distinctive about human rights, when compared with the rights claims associated with modern ...
In this paper I raise some questions about the familiar claim, recently reiterated by James Griffin,...
The discursive character of human rights prevents a precise summary of historical origin, rationale,...
What is and should be the scope of our appeals to human rights? To what desiderata should our theory...
AbstractThe historical progression of the idea of ‘Rights’ and ‘Citizenship’ are embedded in a narra...
In this chapter, I assume that human rights animate and underlie human rights practice, rather than ...
Human rights theory and practice have long been stuck in a rut. Although disagreement is the norm i...
Charles Beitz has presented us with a new and novel theory of human rights, one that is motivated by...
James Griffin’s book “On Human Rights” is a critical account of the global leading imposition of hum...
Human rights are the pervasive practical and political concept, discussed in various branches: polit...
In a variety of disciplines, there exists a consensus that human rights are individual claim rights ...
In this contribution, I challenge Charles Beitz’ account of international human rights law within hi...
The idea of human rights is that they are assumed to derive from some innate feature that all humans...