Add to ORKGTreballs Finals de Grau de Física, Facultat de Física, Universitat de Barcelona, Curs: 2017, Tutor: Enric Pérez CanalsUnder the title \Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality be Considered Complete?" Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen questioned the orthodox quantum-mechanical description of physical phenomena. This work aims to summarize and explain this argument and the consequent response by Bohr, provides the critical analysis of contemporary theorists to the referred debate and briefly exposes the author's opinion on the controvers
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 b...
This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description ...
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen (EPR) reported on a thought experiment th...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen against the completeness ...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 b...
This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description ...
In 1935, Albert Einstein, Boris Podolsky, and Nathan Rosen (EPR) reported on a thought experiment th...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
A frequently given version of the argument of Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen against the completeness ...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
Ignited by Einstein and Bohr a century ago, the philosophical struggle about Reality is yet unfinish...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
From conceptual point of view, we argue about the nature of reality inferred from EPR argument in qu...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...