Add to ORKGIn 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompleteness of quantum mechanics, using the example of two spatially separated but entangled particles. In his almost equally famous reply, Niels Bohr argued against EPR by providing a careful analysis of quantum measurements from the point of view of complementarity. Perhaps oddly, this analysis focuses on the example of a *single* particle passing through a slit. In this paper I argue that the disanalogy between the two examples is only apparent, and does not constitute an obstacle in trying to understand Bohr's views on complementarity
The Einstein-Rupp experiments have been unduly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While ...
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 b...
Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is often cast as positivist and sometimes explicitl...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and ...
This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description ...
It is argued that Niels Bohr ultimately arrived at positivistic and antirealist-flavored statements ...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
It is argued that Niels Bohr ultimately arrived at positivistic and antirealist-flavored statements ...
Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle is a tenuous synthesis of seemingly discrepant theoretical ap...
Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle is a tenuous synthesis of seemingly discrepant theoretical ap...
Recent work on Bohr's reply to EPR has helped improve our understanding of Bohr's reply, but further...
“I have been unable to achieve a sharp formulation of Bohr’s principle of complementarity despite mu...
The Einstein-Rupp experiments have been unduly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While ...
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 b...
Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is often cast as positivist and sometimes explicitl...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
In 1935, Einstein, Podolsky and Rosen (EPR) famously published a paper arguing for the incompletenes...
Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics has been criticized as incoherent and opportunistic, and ...
This study posits that Bohr failed to defend the completeness of the quantum mechanical description ...
It is argued that Niels Bohr ultimately arrived at positivistic and antirealist-flavored statements ...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
Although Bohr's reply to the EPR argument is supposed to be a watershed moment in the development of...
It is argued that Niels Bohr ultimately arrived at positivistic and antirealist-flavored statements ...
Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle is a tenuous synthesis of seemingly discrepant theoretical ap...
Niels Bohr’s complementarity principle is a tenuous synthesis of seemingly discrepant theoretical ap...
Recent work on Bohr's reply to EPR has helped improve our understanding of Bohr's reply, but further...
“I have been unable to achieve a sharp formulation of Bohr’s principle of complementarity despite mu...
The Einstein-Rupp experiments have been unduly neglected in the history of quantum mechanics. While ...
In loving memory of Asher Peres, we discuss a most important and influential paper written in 1935 b...
Niels Bohr's interpretation of quantum mechanics is often cast as positivist and sometimes explicitl...