Measuring risk aversion is sensitive to assumptions about the wealth in subjects’ utility functions. Data from the same subjects in low- and high-stake lottery decisions allow estimating the wealth in a pre-specified one-parameter utility function simultaneously with risk aversion. This paper first shows how wealth estimates can be identified assuming constant relative risk aversion (CRRA). Using the data from a recent experiment by Holt and Laury (2002), it is shown that most subjects’ behavior is consistent with CRRA at some wealth level. However, for realistic wealth levels most subjects’ behavior implies a decreasing relative risk aversion. An alternative explanation is that subjects do not fully integrate their wealth with income from ...
Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible lev...
A menu of paired lottery choices is structured so that the crossover point to the high-risk lottery ...
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility f...
Measuring risk aversion is sensitive to assumptions about the wealth in subjects’ utility functions....
How does risk aversion change in wealth? To answer this question, we implemented a field experiment ...
The theory of expected utility maximization (EUM) explains risk aversion as due to diminishing margi...
We show that if an agent is uncertain about the precise form of his utility function, his actual rel...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Combining a standard measure of concern about low relative wealth and a standard measure of relative...
International audienceThis paper focuses on the consequences on asset allocation of an empirical fac...
This paper discusses solutions derived from lottery experiments using two alternative assumptions: t...
This paper is the first to examine whether UK households exhibit constant or time-varying relative r...
How does risk tolerance vary with stake size? This important question cannot be adequately answered ...
We study the relative risk aversion of an individual with particular social preferences: his wellbei...
There is a considerable variation in estimates of the degree of risk aversion in the literature. Th...
Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible lev...
A menu of paired lottery choices is structured so that the crossover point to the high-risk lottery ...
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility f...
Measuring risk aversion is sensitive to assumptions about the wealth in subjects’ utility functions....
How does risk aversion change in wealth? To answer this question, we implemented a field experiment ...
The theory of expected utility maximization (EUM) explains risk aversion as due to diminishing margi...
We show that if an agent is uncertain about the precise form of his utility function, his actual rel...
This paper contributes to an important recent debate around expected utility and risk aversion. Reje...
Combining a standard measure of concern about low relative wealth and a standard measure of relative...
International audienceThis paper focuses on the consequences on asset allocation of an empirical fac...
This paper discusses solutions derived from lottery experiments using two alternative assumptions: t...
This paper is the first to examine whether UK households exhibit constant or time-varying relative r...
How does risk tolerance vary with stake size? This important question cannot be adequately answered ...
We study the relative risk aversion of an individual with particular social preferences: his wellbei...
There is a considerable variation in estimates of the degree of risk aversion in the literature. Th...
Evidence of risk aversion in laboratory settings over small stakes leads to a priori implausible lev...
A menu of paired lottery choices is structured so that the crossover point to the high-risk lottery ...
Within the expected-utility framework, the only explanation for risk aversion is that the utility f...