This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We calibrate a stylized principal-agent model to the observed contracts of 595 CEOs and show that this model can explain observed option holdings and high base salaries remarkably well for a range of parameterizations. We also derive and calibrate the general shape of the optimal contract that is increasing and convex for medium and high outcomes and drops discontinuously to the lowest possible payout for low outcomes. We identify the critical features of the loss-aversion model that render optimal contracts convex
We calibrate the standard principal–agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal s...
This paper examines optimal compensation contracts when executives can hedge their personal portfoli...
This paper presents a united framework for understanding the determinants of both CEO incentives and...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We calib...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We calib...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We show ...
We estimate a standard principal agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal stoc...
Executive stock options reward success but do not penalise failure. In contrast, the standard princi...
Compensation schemes often reward success but do not penalize failure. Fixed salaries with stock opt...
We estimate a standard principal agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal stoc...
This dissertation analyzes existing managerial and employee compensation schemes in the light of rec...
We use a comparative approach to study the incentives provided by different types of compensation co...
textabstractWe consider a model in which shareholders provide a risk-averse CEO with risktaking ince...
In order to determine the structure of the optimal CEO contract, we create a principal agent model a...
Executive stock options reward success but do not penalise failure. In contrast, the standard princi...
We calibrate the standard principal–agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal s...
This paper examines optimal compensation contracts when executives can hedge their personal portfoli...
This paper presents a united framework for understanding the determinants of both CEO incentives and...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We calib...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We calib...
This paper analyzes optimal executive compensation contracts when managers are loss averse. We show ...
We estimate a standard principal agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal stoc...
Executive stock options reward success but do not penalise failure. In contrast, the standard princi...
Compensation schemes often reward success but do not penalize failure. Fixed salaries with stock opt...
We estimate a standard principal agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal stoc...
This dissertation analyzes existing managerial and employee compensation schemes in the light of rec...
We use a comparative approach to study the incentives provided by different types of compensation co...
textabstractWe consider a model in which shareholders provide a risk-averse CEO with risktaking ince...
In order to determine the structure of the optimal CEO contract, we create a principal agent model a...
Executive stock options reward success but do not penalise failure. In contrast, the standard princi...
We calibrate the standard principal–agent model with constant relative risk aversion and lognormal s...
This paper examines optimal compensation contracts when executives can hedge their personal portfoli...
This paper presents a united framework for understanding the determinants of both CEO incentives and...