The only ground for arguing that monopoly may create superior incen-tives to invent is that appropriability may be greater under monopoly than under competition. Whatever differences may exist in this direction must, of course, still be offset against the monopolist’s disincentive created by his preinvention monopoly profi ts. —Arrow (1962, 622) As soon as we go into details and inquire into the individual items in which progress was most conspicuous, the trail leads not to the doors of those fi rms that work under conditions of comparatively free competi-tion but precisely to the doors of the large concerns... and a shocking suspicion dawns upon us that big business may have had more to do with creating that standard of life than with keep...
The purpose of this article is to show that there is a gap in the literature on the sources of monop...
We participate in the lasting debate about the persistence of monopolies under technological change...
This paper focuses on innovation for new product with exogenously determined horizontal difference f...
In this paper we reconsider the well known Schumpeterian hypotesis stating the superiority of monopo...
Arrow (1962) showed that a secure monopolist (unconcerned with preemption) has a weaker incentive th...
Using a simple linear demand and marginal cost function, we demonstrate that both competition and mo...
Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:3597.447(157) / BLDSC - British Library Do...
Innovation enables monopolists to lower their costs, expand their outputs, and reduce their prices. ...
Edward Chamberlin’s theory of monopolistic competition influenced greatly the development of marketi...
The purpose of this article is to show that there is a gap in the literature on the sources of monop...
In Defense of Monopoly offers an unconventional but empirically grounded argument in favor of market...
A commonly-cited finding in the innovation literature is that a monopoly tends to innovate too littl...
Joseph Schumpeter\u27s vision of competition saw it as a destructive process in which effort, assets...
A new rationale for the persistence of monopolies is based on a precommitment of the incumbent monop...
When it speaks of Schumpeterian hypothesis we refer to the close relationship that exists between t...
The purpose of this article is to show that there is a gap in the literature on the sources of monop...
We participate in the lasting debate about the persistence of monopolies under technological change...
This paper focuses on innovation for new product with exogenously determined horizontal difference f...
In this paper we reconsider the well known Schumpeterian hypotesis stating the superiority of monopo...
Arrow (1962) showed that a secure monopolist (unconcerned with preemption) has a weaker incentive th...
Using a simple linear demand and marginal cost function, we demonstrate that both competition and mo...
Available from British Library Document Supply Centre-DSC:3597.447(157) / BLDSC - British Library Do...
Innovation enables monopolists to lower their costs, expand their outputs, and reduce their prices. ...
Edward Chamberlin’s theory of monopolistic competition influenced greatly the development of marketi...
The purpose of this article is to show that there is a gap in the literature on the sources of monop...
In Defense of Monopoly offers an unconventional but empirically grounded argument in favor of market...
A commonly-cited finding in the innovation literature is that a monopoly tends to innovate too littl...
Joseph Schumpeter\u27s vision of competition saw it as a destructive process in which effort, assets...
A new rationale for the persistence of monopolies is based on a precommitment of the incumbent monop...
When it speaks of Schumpeterian hypothesis we refer to the close relationship that exists between t...
The purpose of this article is to show that there is a gap in the literature on the sources of monop...
We participate in the lasting debate about the persistence of monopolies under technological change...
This paper focuses on innovation for new product with exogenously determined horizontal difference f...