We found that scientists in Australia spent more than five centuries' worth of time preparing research-grant proposals for consideration by the largest funding scheme of 2012. Because just 20.5% of these applications were successful, the equivalent of some four centuries of effort returned no immediate benefit to researchers and wasted valuable research time. The system needs reforming and alternative funding processes should be investigated..
Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family rel...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
Objective: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
In 2012, Danielle Herbert, Adrian Barnett, Philip Clarke and Nicholas Graves published an article en...
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
Researchers spend an average of 38 working days preparing an NHMRC Project Grant proposal, but with ...
Letter in response to article: "On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study ...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
OBJECTIVE: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Currently most public research is funded by project-based grant schemes and applying for these is an...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
It has become usual practice for the Australian Federal Government to shape the country’s research p...
Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family rel...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
Objective: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
In 2012, Danielle Herbert, Adrian Barnett, Philip Clarke and Nicholas Graves published an article en...
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
Researchers spend an average of 38 working days preparing an NHMRC Project Grant proposal, but with ...
Letter in response to article: "On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study ...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
OBJECTIVE: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Currently most public research is funded by project-based grant schemes and applying for these is an...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
It has become usual practice for the Australian Federal Government to shape the country’s research p...
Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family rel...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...
More than ten years ago, Linda Butler (2003a) published a well-cited article claiming that the Austr...