New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for grants from the country's largest health and medical research grants scheme in 2012, and that around 75% of this time was spent on unsuccessful applications.\ud \ud The Queensland University of Technology (QUT) study also found that spending more time on a funding proposal did not equate to a greater chance of success
Unsuccessful applicants' increased productivity shows that work on rejected proposals is not necessa...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family re...
<div><p>We surveyed 113 astronomers and 82 psychologists active in applying for federally funded res...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
We found that scientists in Australia spent more than five centuries' worth of time preparing resear...
Researchers spend an average of 38 working days preparing an NHMRC Project Grant proposal, but with ...
Objective: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
In 2012, Danielle Herbert, Adrian Barnett, Philip Clarke and Nicholas Graves published an article en...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
OBJECTIVE: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Letter in response to article: "On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study ...
Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family rel...
We surveyed 113 astronomers and 82 psychologists active in applying for federally funded research on...
Unsuccessful applicants' increased productivity shows that work on rejected proposals is not necessa...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family re...
<div><p>We surveyed 113 astronomers and 82 psychologists active in applying for federally funded res...
New Australian research has found scientists spent the equivalent of 550 working years applying for ...
We found that scientists in Australia spent more than five centuries' worth of time preparing resear...
Researchers spend an average of 38 working days preparing an NHMRC Project Grant proposal, but with ...
Objective: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the time spent by the researchers for preparing grant proposals, and to exami...
In 2012, Danielle Herbert, Adrian Barnett, Philip Clarke and Nicholas Graves published an article en...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
OBJECTIVE: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Objective: To examine if streamlining a medical research funding application process saved time for ...
Letter in response to article: "On the time spent preparing grant proposals: an observational study ...
Objective To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family rel...
We surveyed 113 astronomers and 82 psychologists active in applying for federally funded research on...
Unsuccessful applicants' increased productivity shows that work on rejected proposals is not necessa...
OBJECTIVE: To examine the impact of applying for funding on personal workloads, stress and family re...
<div><p>We surveyed 113 astronomers and 82 psychologists active in applying for federally funded res...