Review Article Clinical Evidences of Laparoscopic Versus Open Surgery for Colorectal Cancer

Laparoscopic surgery has widely spread in the treatment of colorectal cancer. In Japan, a nation-wide survey has shown that a rate of advanced colorectal cancer has increased gradu-ally and reached 65 % of the total cases for colorectal cancer in 2007. For colon cancer, many randomized controlled trials regarding short-term outcome demonstrate that laparoscopic surgery is feasible, safe and has many benefits including reduction in a peri-operative mor-tality. In terms of long-term outcome, four randomized controlled trials insist that there are no differences in both laparoscopic and open surgeries. However, there are still more important issues including long-term oncological outcome for advanced colon cancer, cost effectiveness and the impact on quality of life of patients. Meanwhile, for rectal cancer, a controversy per-sists with regard to the appropriateness of laparoscopic surgery because of concerns over the safety of the procedure and a necessity of lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer. In the present, laparoscopic surgery is acceptable for Stage I colon cancer, whereas there are controversies for Stage II/III colon cancer and each staged rectal cancer because of inadequate clinical evidences. Whether laparoscopic surgery further spreads to be applied for colorectal cancer or not, it would be confirmed by Japanese large-scale phase III trial (JCOG0404) estimating oncological outcome for Stage II/III colon cancer and a Phase II trial estimating the feasibility for Stage 0/I rectal cancer in near future. Key words: laparoscopic surgery – colorectal cancer – randomized controlled trial – multicenter stud