Add to ORKGIn The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that all subjects of a life have equal inherent value and an equal right to not be caused harm. Moreover, he defends the idea that one of the ways in which subjects of a life can be harmed is by being killed. This implies that all subjects of a life have an equal right not to be killed. One of the most important challenges to this view stems from the thought that the value of life is greater for more psychologically complex beings. This has led philosophers like Mary Anne Warren to hold that some beings have a stronger right to life than others. I argue that it makes sense to think that life has greater value for some beings than others. However, I aim to reconcile this position with Regan\u27...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
[[abstract]]Tom Regan's four explanations of animal rights are examined and rejected as inadequate. ...
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that all subjects of a life have equal inherent valu...
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that all subjects of a life have equal inherent valu...
In this dissertation, my primary aim is to defend the idea that animals have a basic moral right to ...
My argument in this section turns on considerations about thenatural “right to life” that we humans ...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Down through the past decade and more, no philosophical writer has taken a greater interest in the i...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Do animals have rights similar to humans? In the philosophical debate concerning this question there...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
[[abstract]]Tom Regan's four explanations of animal rights are examined and rejected as inadequate. ...
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that all subjects of a life have equal inherent valu...
In The Case for Animal Rights, Tom Regan argues that all subjects of a life have equal inherent valu...
In this dissertation, my primary aim is to defend the idea that animals have a basic moral right to ...
My argument in this section turns on considerations about thenatural “right to life” that we humans ...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
This article reconstructs the theoretical premises of Tom Regan’s animal ethics, the American philos...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Down through the past decade and more, no philosophical writer has taken a greater interest in the i...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Do animals have rights similar to humans? In the philosophical debate concerning this question there...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
Tom Regan argues that human beings and some non-human animals have moral rights because they are “su...
[[abstract]]Tom Regan's four explanations of animal rights are examined and rejected as inadequate. ...