Abstract: We design experiments to study the extent to which individuals differ in their motivations behind costly punishment and rewarding. Our findings qualify existing evidence and suggest that the largest fraction of players is motivated by a mixture of both inequity-aversion and reciprocity, while smaller fractions are primarily motivated by pure inequity-aversion and pure reciprocity. These findings provide new insights into the literature on other-regarding preferences and may help to reconcile important phenomena reported in the experimental literature on punishment and reward
Recent behavioral experiments aimed at understanding the evolutionary foundations of human cooperati...
Departures from pure self interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social ...
Cooperation among people who are not related to each other is sustained by the availability of punis...
We design experiments to study the extent to which individuals differ in their motivations behind co...
Considerable experimental evidence indicates that reciprocity and inequality aversion are important ...
We explores the motivations behind costly punishment in social dilemmas, specifically focusing on re...
Heterogeneity in contribution levels within public goods games (PGGs) is indicative of individual se...
We study the co-evolutionary emergence of fairness preferences in the form of other-regarding behavi...
Do people have a stronger propensity to reward or punish? When reacting to intentions, Offerman (200...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Heterogeneity in contribution levels within public goods games (PGGs) is indicative of individual se...
While the opportunity to punish selfish and reward generous behavior coexist in many instances in da...
An online survey with 115 participants, conducted between February and May 2020, delivered results o...
Humans often cooperate, voluntarily paying an individual cost to supply a benefit to others. Public ...
Departures from pure self interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social ...
Recent behavioral experiments aimed at understanding the evolutionary foundations of human cooperati...
Departures from pure self interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social ...
Cooperation among people who are not related to each other is sustained by the availability of punis...
We design experiments to study the extent to which individuals differ in their motivations behind co...
Considerable experimental evidence indicates that reciprocity and inequality aversion are important ...
We explores the motivations behind costly punishment in social dilemmas, specifically focusing on re...
Heterogeneity in contribution levels within public goods games (PGGs) is indicative of individual se...
We study the co-evolutionary emergence of fairness preferences in the form of other-regarding behavi...
Do people have a stronger propensity to reward or punish? When reacting to intentions, Offerman (200...
Assuming rationality of profit maximising agents, various economic models made specific and testable...
Heterogeneity in contribution levels within public goods games (PGGs) is indicative of individual se...
While the opportunity to punish selfish and reward generous behavior coexist in many instances in da...
An online survey with 115 participants, conducted between February and May 2020, delivered results o...
Humans often cooperate, voluntarily paying an individual cost to supply a benefit to others. Public ...
Departures from pure self interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social ...
Recent behavioral experiments aimed at understanding the evolutionary foundations of human cooperati...
Departures from pure self interest in economic experiments have recently inspired models of "social ...
Cooperation among people who are not related to each other is sustained by the availability of punis...