Add to ORKGABSTRACT: Implicatures are described as particular forms reasoning from best explanation, in which the para-digm of possible explanations consists of the possible semantic interpretations of a sentence or a word. The need for explanation will be shown to be triggered by conflicts between presumptions, namely hearer’s dialogical expectations and the presumptive sentence meaning. What counts as the best explanation can be established on the grounds of hierarchies of presumptions, dependent on dialogue types and interlocutors ’ culture
This book illustrates how pragmatics transcends the boundaries of linguistics. This volume covers Gr...
The article considers impicatures of utterances. An implicature is information complex which is lit...
The notion of implicature was first introduced by Paul Grice (1967, 1989), who defined it essentiall...
Implicatures are described as particular forms reasoning from best explanation, in which the para-di...
In this paper, we use concepts, structure and tools from argumentation theory to show how conversati...
Conversational implicature is a pragmatic concept of great importance for four reasons. First, impli...
The standard position in pragmatics to date has been that cancellability is useful way of differenti...
The standard position in pragmatics to date has been that cancellability is useful way of differenti...
Standard implementations of Grice’s theory of conversational implicature assume that the derivation ...
This chapter covers the notions of inference and implicature from a broad pragmatic and sociopragmat...
When we speak, we mean more than we say. In this book, the author explains some general processes th...
International audienceOne of the characteristic marks of Gricean implicatures in general, and scalar...
Conversational implicatures (i) are implied by the speaker in making an utterance; (ii) are part of ...
In communication, people cannot be separated from conversations where actually there is something to...
Gricean implicatures are often viewed as a very weak kind of implication, viz., as optional enrichme...
This book illustrates how pragmatics transcends the boundaries of linguistics. This volume covers Gr...
The article considers impicatures of utterances. An implicature is information complex which is lit...
The notion of implicature was first introduced by Paul Grice (1967, 1989), who defined it essentiall...
Implicatures are described as particular forms reasoning from best explanation, in which the para-di...
In this paper, we use concepts, structure and tools from argumentation theory to show how conversati...
Conversational implicature is a pragmatic concept of great importance for four reasons. First, impli...
The standard position in pragmatics to date has been that cancellability is useful way of differenti...
The standard position in pragmatics to date has been that cancellability is useful way of differenti...
Standard implementations of Grice’s theory of conversational implicature assume that the derivation ...
This chapter covers the notions of inference and implicature from a broad pragmatic and sociopragmat...
When we speak, we mean more than we say. In this book, the author explains some general processes th...
International audienceOne of the characteristic marks of Gricean implicatures in general, and scalar...
Conversational implicatures (i) are implied by the speaker in making an utterance; (ii) are part of ...
In communication, people cannot be separated from conversations where actually there is something to...
Gricean implicatures are often viewed as a very weak kind of implication, viz., as optional enrichme...
This book illustrates how pragmatics transcends the boundaries of linguistics. This volume covers Gr...
The article considers impicatures of utterances. An implicature is information complex which is lit...
The notion of implicature was first introduced by Paul Grice (1967, 1989), who defined it essentiall...