For any software system upon which lives depend, the most important question one can ask about it is, 'How do we know the system is safe?' Despite the critical importance of this question, no widely accepted, generally applicable answer exists. Instead, debate continues to rage over the question, with theorists and practitioners quarrelling with each other and amongst themselves. This paper suggests a possible way forward towards quelling the quarrels, based on refining the critical safety question into additional questions, which may be more likely to have answers on which a consensus can be reached
Software itself is not hazardous, but since software and hardware share common interfaces there is a...
Software Safety vs Software Reliability While looking back through Vol. 56, No. 1 (Summer 2020) of J...
Safe use of software in safety-critical applications requires well-founded means of determining whet...
For any software system upon which lives depend, the most important question one can ask about it is...
Software safety and its relationship to other qualities are discussed. It is shown that standard rel...
Abstract. A safety case must resolve concerns of two different kinds: how complete and accurate is o...
One of the most basic questions anyone can ask is, 'How do I know that what I think I know is true?'...
Safety, as discussed in contemporary epistemology, is a feature of true beliefs. Safe beliefs, when ...
There are many computer-based medical applications in which safety and not reliability is the overri...
Safety arguments typically have some weaknesses. To show that the overall confidence in the safety a...
An influential proposal is that knowledge involves safe belief. A belief is safe, in the relevant se...
In system development, epistemic uncertainty is an ever-present possibility when reasoning about the...
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could ...
The development of software for safety critical systems is guided by standards. Most standards ident...
Until recently, NASA did not consider allowing computers total control of flight systems. Human oper...
Software itself is not hazardous, but since software and hardware share common interfaces there is a...
Software Safety vs Software Reliability While looking back through Vol. 56, No. 1 (Summer 2020) of J...
Safe use of software in safety-critical applications requires well-founded means of determining whet...
For any software system upon which lives depend, the most important question one can ask about it is...
Software safety and its relationship to other qualities are discussed. It is shown that standard rel...
Abstract. A safety case must resolve concerns of two different kinds: how complete and accurate is o...
One of the most basic questions anyone can ask is, 'How do I know that what I think I know is true?'...
Safety, as discussed in contemporary epistemology, is a feature of true beliefs. Safe beliefs, when ...
There are many computer-based medical applications in which safety and not reliability is the overri...
Safety arguments typically have some weaknesses. To show that the overall confidence in the safety a...
An influential proposal is that knowledge involves safe belief. A belief is safe, in the relevant se...
In system development, epistemic uncertainty is an ever-present possibility when reasoning about the...
Safety-based theories of knowledge face a difficulty surrounding necessary truths: no subject could ...
The development of software for safety critical systems is guided by standards. Most standards ident...
Until recently, NASA did not consider allowing computers total control of flight systems. Human oper...
Software itself is not hazardous, but since software and hardware share common interfaces there is a...
Software Safety vs Software Reliability While looking back through Vol. 56, No. 1 (Summer 2020) of J...
Safe use of software in safety-critical applications requires well-founded means of determining whet...