Abstract There are numerous textbooks on regular languages. Many of them focus on fi-nite automata for proving properties. Unfortunately, automata are not so straightforward to formalise in theorem provers. The reason is that natural representations for automata are graphs, matrices or functions, none of which are inductive datatypes. Regular expressions can be defined straightforwardly as a datatype and a corresponding reasoning infrastruc-ture comes for free in theorem provers. We show in this paper that a central result from formal language theory—the Myhill-Nerode Theorem—can be recreated using only regular expressions. From this theorem many closure properties of regular languages follow.
We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a lan...
This paper presents a new polynomial-time algorithm for the inclusion problem for certain pairs of r...
Contents 1 REGULAR LANGUAGES 1 1.1 Regular Expressions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
There are many proofs of the Myhill-Nerode theorem using au-tomata. In this library we give a proof ...
International audienceWe explore the theory of regular language representations in the constructive ...
Abstract. We solve an open question of Milner [1984]. We define a set of so-called well-behaved fini...
Abstract. CF-expressions are defined which generalize the regular one. It is established that so cal...
We present a constructive formalization of the Myhill-Nerode the-orem on the minimization of nite au...
We consider two formalisms for representing regular languages: constant height pushdown automata and...
The article describes a compact formalization of the relation between regular expressions and determ...
The Myhill-Nerode Theorem (that for any regular language, there is a canonical recognizing device) i...
In the last years, some extensions of ω-regular languages, namely, ωB-regular (ω-regular languages e...
The materials in this paper are elementary. A language L over an alphabet I is said to be regular if...
Abstract. An original algorithm for transformation of finite automata to regular expressions is pres...
We introduce regular languages of morphisms in free monoidal categories, with their associated gramm...
We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a lan...
This paper presents a new polynomial-time algorithm for the inclusion problem for certain pairs of r...
Contents 1 REGULAR LANGUAGES 1 1.1 Regular Expressions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....
There are many proofs of the Myhill-Nerode theorem using au-tomata. In this library we give a proof ...
International audienceWe explore the theory of regular language representations in the constructive ...
Abstract. We solve an open question of Milner [1984]. We define a set of so-called well-behaved fini...
Abstract. CF-expressions are defined which generalize the regular one. It is established that so cal...
We present a constructive formalization of the Myhill-Nerode the-orem on the minimization of nite au...
We consider two formalisms for representing regular languages: constant height pushdown automata and...
The article describes a compact formalization of the relation between regular expressions and determ...
The Myhill-Nerode Theorem (that for any regular language, there is a canonical recognizing device) i...
In the last years, some extensions of ω-regular languages, namely, ωB-regular (ω-regular languages e...
The materials in this paper are elementary. A language L over an alphabet I is said to be regular if...
Abstract. An original algorithm for transformation of finite automata to regular expressions is pres...
We introduce regular languages of morphisms in free monoidal categories, with their associated gramm...
We establish a Myhill-Nerode type theorem for higher-dimensional automata (HDAs), stating that a lan...
This paper presents a new polynomial-time algorithm for the inclusion problem for certain pairs of r...
Contents 1 REGULAR LANGUAGES 1 1.1 Regular Expressions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....