footprint within the existing project boundary which has been characterized as the Plot Plan Change (PPC). As the NRC staff is aware, the plant footprint relocation will result in changes to the Combined License Application (COLA) and potentially to new and previously responded to Requests for Additional Information (RAIs). PPL declassified this docketed schedule information from regulatory commitment status in Reference 3, with an agreement to update the staff via weekly teleconferences as the project moves forward. PPL has committed to provide the NRC with COLA supplements, consisting of revised COLA Sections and associated RAI responses/revisions, as they are developed. These COLA supplements will only include the changes related to that...
During the acceptance review of the combined license application for Comanche Peak 3 and 4 (Referenc...
This report describes the work and vision of the team chartered to redesign the process for licensin...
combined license (COLA) for Fermi 3. As part of the Acceptance Review, the NRC staff raised question...
The purpose of this letter is to provide information supporting the recent Progress Energy revision ...
Pursuant to 10 CFR § 50.90, Nuclear Management Company, LLC, (NMC) proposes to amend Kewaunee Nuclea...
A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Nearly ...
requests an the changes DESCRIPTION The proposed amendment revises the Unit Nos. 1 and 2 TS Administ...
If Yucca Mountain, Nevada is designated as the site for development of a geologic repository for dis...
Subject: Revised Responses to MELLLA+ RAIs (IAC No MB6157) In References 1 and 2, GE responded to NR...
FPL informed the NRC of the schedule for providing this response in Reference 2. The attachment iden...
Review Questions (NRC Project No. 757) In the referenced letter, the Detroit Edison Company submitte...
staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants inten...
noted our intention to conduct an industry review of the document and that additional changes may re...
1These are modifications to a plant's design, operation, or other activities that require NRC a...
Interactions between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) staff and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi...
During the acceptance review of the combined license application for Comanche Peak 3 and 4 (Referenc...
This report describes the work and vision of the team chartered to redesign the process for licensin...
combined license (COLA) for Fermi 3. As part of the Acceptance Review, the NRC staff raised question...
The purpose of this letter is to provide information supporting the recent Progress Energy revision ...
Pursuant to 10 CFR § 50.90, Nuclear Management Company, LLC, (NMC) proposes to amend Kewaunee Nuclea...
A letter report issued by the Government Accountability Office with an abstract that begins "Nearly ...
requests an the changes DESCRIPTION The proposed amendment revises the Unit Nos. 1 and 2 TS Administ...
If Yucca Mountain, Nevada is designated as the site for development of a geologic repository for dis...
Subject: Revised Responses to MELLLA+ RAIs (IAC No MB6157) In References 1 and 2, GE responded to NR...
FPL informed the NRC of the schedule for providing this response in Reference 2. The attachment iden...
Review Questions (NRC Project No. 757) In the referenced letter, the Detroit Edison Company submitte...
staff responsible for the review of applications to construct and operate nuclear power plants inten...
noted our intention to conduct an industry review of the document and that additional changes may re...
1These are modifications to a plant's design, operation, or other activities that require NRC a...
Interactions between the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) staff and the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commi...
During the acceptance review of the combined license application for Comanche Peak 3 and 4 (Referenc...
This report describes the work and vision of the team chartered to redesign the process for licensin...
combined license (COLA) for Fermi 3. As part of the Acceptance Review, the NRC staff raised question...