Add to ORKGThe study of the historical Jesus is a current issue in North American academic discourse. Two thousand years after Jesus of Nazareth walked the earth, scholars are still actively and even heatedly debating his life and his works. Some of these views can work together, while some directly oppose one another. There are views that most mainstream American Christians ar
The personality and historicity of Jesus has posed serious problems to contemporary New Testament sc...
In this article a distinction is made between social scientific criticism and historiography. Histor...
We are about to discuss a subject that is quite difficult - if not impossible - to treat in complete...
Perceptions of the relationship between the historical study of Jesus and Christian theology have sw...
Since the most important sources for our knowledge are the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mark and Q), histo...
Religious historians debate the political and philosophical positions of Jesus of Nazareth. The rese...
Educação Superior::Ciências Humanas::TeologiaEducação Superior::Ciências Humanas::HistóriaPresents a...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
19th-century attempts to reconstruct the historical Jesus often featured the theory of a “Galilean c...
The link between historical Jesus studies and the broader cultural contexts has been largely lost in...
The aim of this review article is to participate in the current “Jesus studies” debate. “Jesus in Ne...
Who is Jesus? What did he do? What did he say? -Are the traditional answer to these questions still ...
Criteria of authenticity, whose roots go back to before the pioneering work of Albert Schweitzer, ha...
<strong>Why Jesus studies? </strong>Present-day historical Jesus studies are the epistem...
This article considers the reasons why modern scholars have felt the need to go behind the four Gosp...
The personality and historicity of Jesus has posed serious problems to contemporary New Testament sc...
In this article a distinction is made between social scientific criticism and historiography. Histor...
We are about to discuss a subject that is quite difficult - if not impossible - to treat in complete...
Perceptions of the relationship between the historical study of Jesus and Christian theology have sw...
Since the most important sources for our knowledge are the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mark and Q), histo...
Religious historians debate the political and philosophical positions of Jesus of Nazareth. The rese...
Educação Superior::Ciências Humanas::TeologiaEducação Superior::Ciências Humanas::HistóriaPresents a...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
19th-century attempts to reconstruct the historical Jesus often featured the theory of a “Galilean c...
The link between historical Jesus studies and the broader cultural contexts has been largely lost in...
The aim of this review article is to participate in the current “Jesus studies” debate. “Jesus in Ne...
Who is Jesus? What did he do? What did he say? -Are the traditional answer to these questions still ...
Criteria of authenticity, whose roots go back to before the pioneering work of Albert Schweitzer, ha...
<strong>Why Jesus studies? </strong>Present-day historical Jesus studies are the epistem...
This article considers the reasons why modern scholars have felt the need to go behind the four Gosp...
The personality and historicity of Jesus has posed serious problems to contemporary New Testament sc...
In this article a distinction is made between social scientific criticism and historiography. Histor...
We are about to discuss a subject that is quite difficult - if not impossible - to treat in complete...