<strong>Why Jesus studies? </strong>Present-day historical Jesus studies are the epistemological product of what has become known as the New Historicism. The aim of the article is to emphasize two aspects of the New Historicism as epistemological approach. The one aspect focuses on the profitability of this endeavour and the other on the historical nature of the New Historicism. As far as profitability is concerned, the social standing and identity of the researcher are emphasized. Among otherthings, the social interests of the researcher are taken into account. Concerning the historical nature of this kind of research, a distinction is drawn between the Jesus of history and the Jesus of faith. The aim of the article is to gain ...
The issue of history and historicity is reviewed in this article. The efforts of New Historicism is ...
<strong>Let us vote: What did Jesus really say?</strong><br /> Since 1985 the stud...
<strong>The resurrection as historical event</strong><p>In this article the unders...
<strong>Historical Jesus research in perspective.</strong> The quest for the historical ...
<strong>The relevance of historical Jesus research for the theology of the church. </strong...
<strong>The Jesus of history: Hermeneutic premises in the research of JP Meier. </strong>...
<strong>The Jesus of history: A citical relection on J P Meier's Jesus-proile.</strong> ...
<strong>Two compatible constructs in current historical Jesus research, Part I: John Dominic C...
This article considers the reasons why modern scholars have felt the need to go behind the four Gosp...
The aim of this review article is to participate in the current “Jesus studies” debate. “Jesus in Ne...
The link between historical Jesus studies and the broader cultural contexts has been largely lost in...
<p><strong>Historical Jesus research and the church's vision of evangelism. </strong&...
<p><strong>Sources for Jesus studies.</strong></p><p>The premise of th...
<strong>Beyond objectivism and relativism: Towards new foundations for historical Jesus studie...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
The issue of history and historicity is reviewed in this article. The efforts of New Historicism is ...
<strong>Let us vote: What did Jesus really say?</strong><br /> Since 1985 the stud...
<strong>The resurrection as historical event</strong><p>In this article the unders...
<strong>Historical Jesus research in perspective.</strong> The quest for the historical ...
<strong>The relevance of historical Jesus research for the theology of the church. </strong...
<strong>The Jesus of history: Hermeneutic premises in the research of JP Meier. </strong>...
<strong>The Jesus of history: A citical relection on J P Meier's Jesus-proile.</strong> ...
<strong>Two compatible constructs in current historical Jesus research, Part I: John Dominic C...
This article considers the reasons why modern scholars have felt the need to go behind the four Gosp...
The aim of this review article is to participate in the current “Jesus studies” debate. “Jesus in Ne...
The link between historical Jesus studies and the broader cultural contexts has been largely lost in...
<p><strong>Historical Jesus research and the church's vision of evangelism. </strong&...
<p><strong>Sources for Jesus studies.</strong></p><p>The premise of th...
<strong>Beyond objectivism and relativism: Towards new foundations for historical Jesus studie...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
The issue of history and historicity is reviewed in this article. The efforts of New Historicism is ...
<strong>Let us vote: What did Jesus really say?</strong><br /> Since 1985 the stud...
<strong>The resurrection as historical event</strong><p>In this article the unders...