Federal regulations require an IRB to conduct substantive and meaningful continuing review of human subjects research that is within the jurisdiction of the IRB. This guidance outlines the criteria for continuing review, and investigator and IRB responsibilities. Continuing Review Frequency • Continuing review, sometimes referred to as “renewal, ” of all federally funded projects involving human subjects is required at least annually (see 45 CFR 46.109(d) and 21 CFR 56.109(d)) o Even if no changes are made, o Even if the only study activity is participant follow-up, and o Even if the only study activity is data analysis. • The IRB may require more frequent review depending on the level of risk
Most individuals outside of research are unaware of the function of an Institutional Review Board (I...
Research sponsored or funded by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) must be reviewed by the IRB und...
dated, locally-administered groups charged with evaluat-ing human participant research. IRBs, and hu...
The IRB is a body of professional and lay persons who review all research studies from an institutio...
Institutional review boards (IRBs) protect the health, safety, and privacy of people participating i...
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are the primary gatekeepers for the protection of ethical standar...
On September 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an eighteen-year-old man with a rare metabolic disease, died...
Continuing review is an important responsibility of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Though being...
All IRB communications regarding the approval, disapproval or modifications required to secure IRB a...
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to provide practical guidance to assist investigators in the ...
To describe policies and procedures for determining the types of activities that qualify as human re...
The IRB conducts initial review for non-exempt research at convened meetings unless the research is ...
This guidance document assists UCLA investigators with determining which activities require UCLA OHR...
In addition to IRB review and approval, additional committees charged with evaluating scientific val...
The first question a researcher should consider with respect to IRB review is whether the research p...
Most individuals outside of research are unaware of the function of an Institutional Review Board (I...
Research sponsored or funded by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) must be reviewed by the IRB und...
dated, locally-administered groups charged with evaluat-ing human participant research. IRBs, and hu...
The IRB is a body of professional and lay persons who review all research studies from an institutio...
Institutional review boards (IRBs) protect the health, safety, and privacy of people participating i...
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs) are the primary gatekeepers for the protection of ethical standar...
On September 17, 1999, Jesse Gelsinger, an eighteen-year-old man with a rare metabolic disease, died...
Continuing review is an important responsibility of Institutional Review Boards (IRBs). Though being...
All IRB communications regarding the approval, disapproval or modifications required to secure IRB a...
ABSTRACT: The purpose of this paper is to provide practical guidance to assist investigators in the ...
To describe policies and procedures for determining the types of activities that qualify as human re...
The IRB conducts initial review for non-exempt research at convened meetings unless the research is ...
This guidance document assists UCLA investigators with determining which activities require UCLA OHR...
In addition to IRB review and approval, additional committees charged with evaluating scientific val...
The first question a researcher should consider with respect to IRB review is whether the research p...
Most individuals outside of research are unaware of the function of an Institutional Review Board (I...
Research sponsored or funded by the U.S. Department of Defense (DOD) must be reviewed by the IRB und...
dated, locally-administered groups charged with evaluat-ing human participant research. IRBs, and hu...