The standard literature on the value of life relies on the assumption that individ-uals are risk neutral with respect to mortality risk. In order to account for mortality risk aversion, we extend the theory to a simple variety of nonadditively separable preferences. The enlargement we propose is relevant for the evaluation of life-saving programs: current practice, we estimate, puts too little weight on mortality risk reduc-tion of the young. Our correction exceeds in magnitude that introduced by the switch from the notion of number of lives saved to the notion of years of life saved
There are no explicit markets for mortality risk reduction. An individual cannot purchase ‘‘mortalit...
We assess individuals’ preferences for time paths of reductions in mortality risk yielding a life-ex...
Much of the literature on the value of life is based on the valuation of small reductions in mortali...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impl...
This paper shows the poor capacity of the additively separable life-cycle model to fit empirical val...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The 1980s marked the first decade in which use of estimates of the value of life based on risk trade...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
James Broughel wants to break the link between the willingness-to-pay principle embodied in the valu...
James Broughel’s essay, “Rethinking the Value of a Statistical Life,” does not rethink the valuation...
The standard model of intertemporal choice assumes risk neutrality towards the length of life: under...
There are no explicit markets for mortality risk reduction. An individual cannot purchase ‘‘mortalit...
We assess individuals’ preferences for time paths of reductions in mortality risk yielding a life-ex...
Much of the literature on the value of life is based on the valuation of small reductions in mortali...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impl...
This paper shows the poor capacity of the additively separable life-cycle model to fit empirical val...
The standard literature on the value of life relies on Yaari’s (1965) model, which includes an impli...
The 1980s marked the first decade in which use of estimates of the value of life based on risk trade...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
It is often asserted that individual willingness to pay to reduce mortality risk is greater among in...
James Broughel wants to break the link between the willingness-to-pay principle embodied in the valu...
James Broughel’s essay, “Rethinking the Value of a Statistical Life,” does not rethink the valuation...
The standard model of intertemporal choice assumes risk neutrality towards the length of life: under...
There are no explicit markets for mortality risk reduction. An individual cannot purchase ‘‘mortalit...
We assess individuals’ preferences for time paths of reductions in mortality risk yielding a life-ex...
Much of the literature on the value of life is based on the valuation of small reductions in mortali...