We developed a modified Conflict Style Inventory- Preferred Conflict-Handling Mode (PCHM) to explain how individuals deal with situations in which their desires are in conflict with another individual or group. The instrument, developed for this research, was based on the Managerial Grid developed by Van de Vliert & Kabanoff [1]. The two variables in the PCHM model are Assertiveness and Cooperativeness. Two additional interacting, independent variables (Motivation and Conflict Escalation) were posited to affect a sudden change in subject action under situations wherein there are different views of recommended decisions
Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to test to what extent a cooperative conflict ...
Since conflict negotiation requires many humans interacting, the modeling of human decision-making w...
To enhance the quality of group decision making, to promote affective acceptance of decisions by all...
ABSTRACT THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATION AND CONFLICT ESCALATION ON THE FIVE ZONE MODEL FOR PREFERRED CONF...
This article focuses on the dual-concern model for choosing the conflict-handling strategies. Dual-c...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the roles of trait affectivity and momentary moods...
Can personality traits account for the handling of internal conflicts? The authors explored how indi...
this paper, we propose a framework for thinking about how conflict issues can be conceptualized, and...
This research addresses individual differences and the process by which individuals resolve intraper...
The effects of personal preference for conflict management on the quality of decisions under coopera...
In this study, we examine three types of conflict (task, relationship, and process) and four dimensi...
There is good evidence that people generally tend to evaluate behaviors, contributions, and outcomes...
Hospitals are examining new management strategies to cope with a variety of economic pressures. Cont...
Conflict is considered a multi-dimensional concept conveying both constructive and destructive overt...
This paper uses Nomology, a decision science approach to structuring qualitative decisions, to put D...
Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to test to what extent a cooperative conflict ...
Since conflict negotiation requires many humans interacting, the modeling of human decision-making w...
To enhance the quality of group decision making, to promote affective acceptance of decisions by all...
ABSTRACT THE IMPACT OF MOTIVATION AND CONFLICT ESCALATION ON THE FIVE ZONE MODEL FOR PREFERRED CONF...
This article focuses on the dual-concern model for choosing the conflict-handling strategies. Dual-c...
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the roles of trait affectivity and momentary moods...
Can personality traits account for the handling of internal conflicts? The authors explored how indi...
this paper, we propose a framework for thinking about how conflict issues can be conceptualized, and...
This research addresses individual differences and the process by which individuals resolve intraper...
The effects of personal preference for conflict management on the quality of decisions under coopera...
In this study, we examine three types of conflict (task, relationship, and process) and four dimensi...
There is good evidence that people generally tend to evaluate behaviors, contributions, and outcomes...
Hospitals are examining new management strategies to cope with a variety of economic pressures. Cont...
Conflict is considered a multi-dimensional concept conveying both constructive and destructive overt...
This paper uses Nomology, a decision science approach to structuring qualitative decisions, to put D...
Purpose The purpose of this study was twofold: first, to test to what extent a cooperative conflict ...
Since conflict negotiation requires many humans interacting, the modeling of human decision-making w...
To enhance the quality of group decision making, to promote affective acceptance of decisions by all...