Add to ORKGAbstract: Oaksford & Chater (O&C) aim to provide teleological explanations of behavior by giving an appropriate normative standard: Bayesian inference. We argue that there is no uncontroversial independent justification for the normativity of Bayesian inference, and that O&C fail to satisfy a necessary condition for teleological explanations: demonstration that the normative prescription played a causal role in the behavior's existence
I argue that having a theory of mind requires having at least implicit knowledge of the norms of the...
We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normat...
Much of the philosophical literature on causation has focused on the concept of actual causation, so...
Abstract: Oaksford & Chater (O&C) aim to provide teleological explanations of behavior by gi...
Oaksford & Chater (O&C) aim to provide teleological explanations of behavior by giving an appropriat...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
It has been suggested that evaluative normativity should be expunged from the psychology of reasonin...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
Bayesian epistemology provides a popular and powerful framework for modeling rational norms on crede...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
It has recently been argued that normative considerations play an important role in causal cognition...
We admire Heyes's attempt to develop a mechanistic account of norm cognition. Nonetheless, her accou...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
The objective of this dissertation is to examine Millikan’s teleosemantics as an attempt to explain...
I argue that having a theory of mind requires having at least implicit knowledge of the norms of the...
We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normat...
Much of the philosophical literature on causation has focused on the concept of actual causation, so...
Abstract: Oaksford & Chater (O&C) aim to provide teleological explanations of behavior by gi...
Oaksford & Chater (O&C) aim to provide teleological explanations of behavior by giving an appropriat...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
It has been suggested that evaluative normativity should be expunged from the psychology of reasonin...
In this work, we present a mathematical model for the emergence of descriptive norms, where the indi...
Bayesian epistemology provides a popular and powerful framework for modeling rational norms on crede...
Norms—that is, specifications of what we ought to do—play a critical role in the study of informal a...
It has recently been argued that normative considerations play an important role in causal cognition...
We admire Heyes's attempt to develop a mechanistic account of norm cognition. Nonetheless, her accou...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
The objective of this dissertation is to examine Millikan’s teleosemantics as an attempt to explain...
I argue that having a theory of mind requires having at least implicit knowledge of the norms of the...
We are neither as pessimistic nor as optimistic as Elqayam & Evans (E&E). The consequences of normat...
Much of the philosophical literature on causation has focused on the concept of actual causation, so...