An international border crosser should only be deemed a criminal if the United States government can prove that, with requisite criminal intent, she engaged in an act aside from crossing the border that would constitute a crime. No longer should crossing the border be a strict liability criminal offense. Doing so will restore balance to the civil immigration system, conserve scarce enforcement resources to target truly criminal behavior, enhance our standing abroad, and help heal our racially-polarized discourse on immigration policy
The intensifying convergence of U.S. criminal law and immigration law poses fundamental structural p...
This Comment calls for comprehensive immigration reform by outlining results of a failed federal imm...
This Article traces the history of two federal immigration crimes that have long supplemented the ci...
An international border crosser should only be deemed a criminal if the United States government can...
Should it be a crime to cross the border into the United States? This Article explores the growing r...
[G]eographical considerations are set forth to indicate the potential scope of legal problems that m...
Bent on curbing unauthorized immigration in the United States, the Department of Homeland Security h...
In this entry the concept of criminalization of migration is presented. Criminalization refers to th...
Professor Romero proposes that unauthorized border crossings must be decriminalized. He advances sev...
Aside from the case of refugees under international law, are non-citizen outsiders morally justified...
The United States is a nation with protected borders and in order to protect the immigration laws co...
Pursuant to Art. 31 (1) of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, a person who ha...
We describe a new consensual theory of borders and immigration that reverses Peter Schuck\u27s and R...
This note explores racial profiling in the enforcement of federal immigration law. In consistently d...
The belief that immigrants are crossing the border, in the stealth of night, with nefarious desires ...
The intensifying convergence of U.S. criminal law and immigration law poses fundamental structural p...
This Comment calls for comprehensive immigration reform by outlining results of a failed federal imm...
This Article traces the history of two federal immigration crimes that have long supplemented the ci...
An international border crosser should only be deemed a criminal if the United States government can...
Should it be a crime to cross the border into the United States? This Article explores the growing r...
[G]eographical considerations are set forth to indicate the potential scope of legal problems that m...
Bent on curbing unauthorized immigration in the United States, the Department of Homeland Security h...
In this entry the concept of criminalization of migration is presented. Criminalization refers to th...
Professor Romero proposes that unauthorized border crossings must be decriminalized. He advances sev...
Aside from the case of refugees under international law, are non-citizen outsiders morally justified...
The United States is a nation with protected borders and in order to protect the immigration laws co...
Pursuant to Art. 31 (1) of the Geneva Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, a person who ha...
We describe a new consensual theory of borders and immigration that reverses Peter Schuck\u27s and R...
This note explores racial profiling in the enforcement of federal immigration law. In consistently d...
The belief that immigrants are crossing the border, in the stealth of night, with nefarious desires ...
The intensifying convergence of U.S. criminal law and immigration law poses fundamental structural p...
This Comment calls for comprehensive immigration reform by outlining results of a failed federal imm...
This Article traces the history of two federal immigration crimes that have long supplemented the ci...