The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Plessy v. Ferguson, which dealt with the constitutionality of racial segregation in the U.S. Topics include the application of precedent in controversial U.S. Supreme Court cases, when the U.S. Constitution can overrule a court decision, and dissenting judicial opinions
At first glance, Separate appears to offer a history of the Supreme Court’s infamous Plessy v. Fergu...
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theo...
By re-writing US Supreme Court opinions that implicate critical dimensions of racial justice, Critic...
In the spirit of the symposium generally, I want to step back a bit and not limit myself to Plessy v...
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
For a symposium on Teaching Ferguson, this essay considers how the standard introductory constitutio...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Legal theorists increasingly have come to recognize and study the existence of a constitutional cano...
“But first, we must believe.” So concludes The Antiracist Constitution, where Brandon Hasbrouck conf...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, which dealt with the forced sterili...
The article focuses on issues related to constitutional rights and its remedies in the U.S. It discu...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
Our Constitution, as it is and as it has been interpreted by our courts, serves white supremacy. The...
During the Rehnquist Court, America has witnessed accelerating federal judicial activism on behalf o...
The concept of color-blindness has long elicited much debate over its precise meaning and the role i...
At first glance, Separate appears to offer a history of the Supreme Court’s infamous Plessy v. Fergu...
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theo...
By re-writing US Supreme Court opinions that implicate critical dimensions of racial justice, Critic...
In the spirit of the symposium generally, I want to step back a bit and not limit myself to Plessy v...
A response to the article Plessy v. Ferguson and the Anti-Canon, by Akhil Amar, published in the N...
For a symposium on Teaching Ferguson, this essay considers how the standard introductory constitutio...
This article contends that, for purposes of settling the law, courts entertaining civil rights lawsu...
Legal theorists increasingly have come to recognize and study the existence of a constitutional cano...
“But first, we must believe.” So concludes The Antiracist Constitution, where Brandon Hasbrouck conf...
The article focuses on the U.S. Supreme Court case Buck v. Bell, which dealt with the forced sterili...
The article focuses on issues related to constitutional rights and its remedies in the U.S. It discu...
This is the latest in Professor Currie\u27s continuing series on the historical development of const...
Our Constitution, as it is and as it has been interpreted by our courts, serves white supremacy. The...
During the Rehnquist Court, America has witnessed accelerating federal judicial activism on behalf o...
The concept of color-blindness has long elicited much debate over its precise meaning and the role i...
At first glance, Separate appears to offer a history of the Supreme Court’s infamous Plessy v. Fergu...
The article discusses what types of legal cases constitute a “canon” on American constitutional theo...
By re-writing US Supreme Court opinions that implicate critical dimensions of racial justice, Critic...
View in ORKG