Examining customer evaluations across different self-service technologies

Purpose Our study examines the influence of different self-service technologies (SSTs) on customer satisfaction with and continued usage of SSTs. Specifically, we compare an interactive voice response (IVR) SST and an online SST from the same provider to assess how to manage these parallel SSTs. Design/methodology/approach A tracking study was employed, beginning with a survey of n=957 SST users to test a model pertaining to SST satisfaction across IVR and online SSTs. These SST users were then tracked over 12 months. The association between customer satisfaction with and continued usage of the SSTs was examined using behavioural data from the service provider. Findings While the overall model was found to be valid across both types of SSTs, perceptions of factors including ease of use, perceived control and reliability differed for IVR and online SSTs. Satisfaction with SSTs is linked with users’ continued use of SSTs, but is not a barrier to users’ adoption of newer SST forms. Research limitations/implications Highlighting the rapid developments in this field, a new SST was introduced by the provider to respondents during the 12-month tracking period, thus complicating the results. Further studies could include the customer purpose for using SSTs as a variable. Practical implications Our findings offer support for organisations offering a suite of SSTs, even if they serve the same purpose. Customers evaluate SST types differently, and even satisfied SST users switch to different SSTs when they become available. Allowing customers to choose the SST that best suits them appears to be good practice. Originality/value We develop a comprehensive model of customer SST satisfaction that is used to undertake a comparison of two different types of SSTs, which has been missing from prior research