An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the two parties to the conflict. The parties may misrepresent evidence in their favor at a cost. The arbiter is concerned about accuracy and low procedural costs. When both parties testify, each of them distorts the evidence less than when they testify alone. When the fixed cost of testifying is low, the arbiter hears both, for intermediate values one, and for high values no party at all. The ability to commit to an adjudication scheme makes it more likely that the arbiter requires evidence
In trials witnesses often slant their testimony to advance their interests. To obtain truthful testi...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
The history of the admissibility standard for expert testimony in American courtrooms reveals that t...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter has to decide a case under a purely adversarial procedure. He can do so using his priors,...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
In trials witnesses often slant their testimony to advance their interests. To obtain truthful testi...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
The history of the admissibility standard for expert testimony in American courtrooms reveals that t...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors or he can ask for further evidence from the ...
An arbiter has to decide a case under a purely adversarial procedure. He can do so using his priors,...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
An arbiter can decide a case on the basis of his priors, or the two parties to the conflict may pres...
In trials witnesses often slant their testimony to advance their interests. To obtain truthful testi...
The last few decades have seen a dramatic shift in the admissibility of expert testimony in American...
The history of the admissibility standard for expert testimony in American courtrooms reveals that t...