<p>Response options for items 1–8 are “disagree” (0 points) or “agree” (1 point). Responses to item 9 are on a scale of 1–5: “not at all,” “slightly,” “moderately,” “very much,” or “extremely.” The first three options (“not at all,” “slightly,” and “moderately”) are scored as 0, and the remaining two options (“very much” and “extremely”) are scored as 1. Items 1–4 constitute the physical subscale. Items 5–9 constitute the psychosocial subscale.</p
Items, descriptive statistics, and ordinal alpha for the psychological barriers scale.</p
The items of the Interpersonal Checklist (ICL) were scaled to a circular model by two different pr...
<p>A. Original version. B. Nine-item short form. Persons of lesser central sensitization and easier ...
<p>All curves at the extreme left represents ‘always’ and at the extreme right represents ‘never’. R...
<p>* the ‘rarely’ response option was not combined with the ‘never’ response option in the function ...
Among Likert scale research spanning a number of disciplines are studies reaching conflicting conclu...
<p>Al of the items are to be rated on a four-point scale (“I totally agree” to “I don't agree at al”...
The purpose of this study was to investigate within- and between-threshold parameter invariance for ...
Whenever one uses a composite scale score from item responses, one is tacitly assuming that the sca...
The fundamental requirement of using Likert scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respond...
scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respondents must use the ordered response categories ...
This study addressed reverse directional item and the number of response categories problems in Like...
<p>Items (C = cognitive, A = affective, P = psychomotor) are ordered by their endorsability. Most di...
Item response theory was applied to Value-Intention Scale which we had been developing onthe basis o...
The authors compared the fit of the 2- and 3-parameter logistic models (2PLM; 3PLM) on 15 unidimensi...
Items, descriptive statistics, and ordinal alpha for the psychological barriers scale.</p
The items of the Interpersonal Checklist (ICL) were scaled to a circular model by two different pr...
<p>A. Original version. B. Nine-item short form. Persons of lesser central sensitization and easier ...
<p>All curves at the extreme left represents ‘always’ and at the extreme right represents ‘never’. R...
<p>* the ‘rarely’ response option was not combined with the ‘never’ response option in the function ...
Among Likert scale research spanning a number of disciplines are studies reaching conflicting conclu...
<p>Al of the items are to be rated on a four-point scale (“I totally agree” to “I don't agree at al”...
The purpose of this study was to investigate within- and between-threshold parameter invariance for ...
Whenever one uses a composite scale score from item responses, one is tacitly assuming that the sca...
The fundamental requirement of using Likert scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respond...
scales to measure affective behaviors-that all respondents must use the ordered response categories ...
This study addressed reverse directional item and the number of response categories problems in Like...
<p>Items (C = cognitive, A = affective, P = psychomotor) are ordered by their endorsability. Most di...
Item response theory was applied to Value-Intention Scale which we had been developing onthe basis o...
The authors compared the fit of the 2- and 3-parameter logistic models (2PLM; 3PLM) on 15 unidimensi...
Items, descriptive statistics, and ordinal alpha for the psychological barriers scale.</p
The items of the Interpersonal Checklist (ICL) were scaled to a circular model by two different pr...
<p>A. Original version. B. Nine-item short form. Persons of lesser central sensitization and easier ...