Add to ORKGRecent Supreme Court decisions prohibiting retaliation by employers against employees seeking to vindicate their rights pursuant to civil rights anti-discrimination laws have significant consequences for employers and managers. The very recent Supreme Court decision in Thompson v. North American Stainless, LP emerges as a very important civil rights decision which materially extends the class of persons who are protected against retaliation in the workplace. The Supreme Court retaliation decisions, particularly the Thompson case, are examined herein; the implications of these Court decisions are addressed; and appropriate recommendations are offered to employers and managers on how to avoid liability for retaliation pursuant to civil rights...
This Article examines how the prevalence of internal policies and complaint procedures for addressin...
This paper explores the elements that define workplace retaliation and the actions that are needed t...
In the UK and the United States, anti-discrimination law prohibits disparate treatment and disparate...
In January 2010, the Supreme Court finally had the opportunity to express its view regarding the via...
Employers want to reduce or eliminate claims of employee retaliation whenever possible because of as...
Retaliation toward employees who report illegal discrimination and/or unethical practices in the wor...
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the rising number of workplace retaliation claims is a problem,...
To retaliate against a man by hurting a member of his family is an ancient method of revenge . . . ....
For decades, courts have struggled with how to treat claims of “third-party retaliation”—situations ...
This article joins the discussion of when employees should be protected against third-party retaliat...
Retaliation, the fastest growing cause of action in discrimination law, has gained considerable atte...
On June 22, 2006, the United States Supreme Court broadened the purview of the anti-retaliation prov...
In its recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Co. v. White, the Supreme Court resolved th...
When a worker complains about discrimination, federal law is supposed to protect that worker from la...
Many employers were shocked and alarmed when the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2006 unanimously establi...
This Article examines how the prevalence of internal policies and complaint procedures for addressin...
This paper explores the elements that define workplace retaliation and the actions that are needed t...
In the UK and the United States, anti-discrimination law prohibits disparate treatment and disparate...
In January 2010, the Supreme Court finally had the opportunity to express its view regarding the via...
Employers want to reduce or eliminate claims of employee retaliation whenever possible because of as...
Retaliation toward employees who report illegal discrimination and/or unethical practices in the wor...
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the rising number of workplace retaliation claims is a problem,...
To retaliate against a man by hurting a member of his family is an ancient method of revenge . . . ....
For decades, courts have struggled with how to treat claims of “third-party retaliation”—situations ...
This article joins the discussion of when employees should be protected against third-party retaliat...
Retaliation, the fastest growing cause of action in discrimination law, has gained considerable atte...
On June 22, 2006, the United States Supreme Court broadened the purview of the anti-retaliation prov...
In its recent decision in Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Co. v. White, the Supreme Court resolved th...
When a worker complains about discrimination, federal law is supposed to protect that worker from la...
Many employers were shocked and alarmed when the U.S. Supreme Court in June 2006 unanimously establi...
This Article examines how the prevalence of internal policies and complaint procedures for addressin...
This paper explores the elements that define workplace retaliation and the actions that are needed t...
In the UK and the United States, anti-discrimination law prohibits disparate treatment and disparate...