Decision-making practice of the Office for the Protection of Competition in cases of proving qualification requirements in public tenders

RESUMÉ AJ "Decision-making practice of the Office for the Protection of Competition in cases of proving qualification requirements in public tenders" The annual report of the Office for the Protection of Competition for the year 2014 comes to a conclusion that the most frequent mistake of a contracting authority is stipulation of disproportional (discriminating) qualification requirements. The objective of my paper is shedding light on selected contentious areas that are dealt with by the Office for the Protection of Competition, by regional courts or by the Supreme Administrative Court respectively, thus illustrating the most frequent mistakes committed by contracting authorities when stipulating qualification requirements. The paper is structured into several chapters for addressing the selected topic. The first part of the paper introduces the basic concepts and the institute of public tenders closely related to subsequent setting of qualification requirements while also referring to elementary judiciary practice. The subsequent chapters describe particular categories of qualification requirements like elementary qualification requirements, vocational qualification requirements, economical and financial qualification requirements, as well as technical qualification requirements. Each chapter showcases..