Quality of smoked products of economically important fish species

The objective of this thesis was to test the environmental friendly additive substance, in particular sodium caseinate, which is not subject to designation "E" on the label of the product, which is unpopular among the consumers, and which would provide so-called a "higher value" to a product of economically important fish species in the Czech Republic, specifically the common carp (Cyprinus carpio), silver carp (Hypophthalmichthys molitrix) and the rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss).Determination of the influence of this additive on microbial and biochemical processes, and also on organoleptic properties of the selected smoked fish was another goal of the work. Three concentrations of this product were used for application in total, in particular 25, 50 and 100 g×kg-1. The results of this work confirmed that, due to caseinate (concentration of 100 g×kg-1) such losses of water were avoided, as observed in case of the control group, to which no additive product was applied, and which served for comparison with the groups treated with caseinate. General carp had an average loss of 12.9 % for the samples treated with sodium caseinate and 14 % for the control group. The silver carp white showed similar results. The group treated with caseinate lost 12.4 % in average, and the control group of approximately 14 %. The best results were recorded with the rainbow trout, which, due to caseinate withheld the largest amount of water, respectively, it did not lose so much of weight, in particular 15.9 % for sodium caseinate compared to 19.3 % measured in the control group, however these differences were not confirmed as statistically conclusive. As for the texture of the meat, tougher samples came out for the ones treated with sodium caseinate compared to the more brittle control group. In carp and trout no statistically noteworthy dissimilarity in stiffness of meat was proved between the control group and the group with the applied additive product. While these differences were significant in silver carp. While for silver carp were these differences significant. The control group showed clearly (p0.05). Tests for the possible presence of Listeria monocytogenes in all of the smoked fish samples and the control group were negative. Nutrient composition was mainly focused on the basic nutrient components, which were the proteins, fats and carbohydrates. The control group did not show any significant differences compared to the group to which sodium caseinate was applied. The results from the consumers and sensory analysis by a panel of trained persons were very similar. No statistically significant differences between the group treated with caseinate sodium, and the untreated so called control group of smoked species of fish