Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal their donation decision to each other. Average donations in the treatment group are significantly higher than in the control group. Paired subjects have the opportunity to revise their donation decision after discussion. Pair members shift toward each others' initial decisions. Subjects are happier with their decision when their donations are larger, but those in pairs are less happy, controlling for amount donated. These findings suggest reluctant altruism due to peer pressure in charitable giving
While the effects of peers on charitable giving have been of considerable interest to social scienti...
Charity could do the most good if every dollar donated went to causes that produced the greatest wel...
The critical research question pondered in this paper is whether donation intentions can be predicte...
Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal th...
Humans are remarkable for the level of altruistic and prosocial behaviour they display. This has bee...
Much fundraising is done by individuals within existing social groups. Exploiting a unique dataset, ...
The success of a charitable campaign will depend on many factors, including solicitation technique, ...
We develop a theory of charitable giving in which donors feel social pressure from a direct solicita...
This dissertation presents three experimental studies with an emphasis on peer influence in people’s...
This study theoretically and empirically examines altruistic and joyof- giving motivations underlyin...
This paper presents a model in which anonymous charitable donations are ratio-nalized by two human t...
This is the author's post-print version of an article whose final and definitive form has been publi...
In this study we examine whether and why human and social resources increase charitable giving. Usin...
People often make charitable donations together with other people, including friends or romantic par...
Every year, 90% of Americans give money to charities. Is such generosity necessarily welfare enhanci...
While the effects of peers on charitable giving have been of considerable interest to social scienti...
Charity could do the most good if every dollar donated went to causes that produced the greatest wel...
The critical research question pondered in this paper is whether donation intentions can be predicte...
Subjects donate individually (control group) or in pairs (treatment group). Those in pairs reveal th...
Humans are remarkable for the level of altruistic and prosocial behaviour they display. This has bee...
Much fundraising is done by individuals within existing social groups. Exploiting a unique dataset, ...
The success of a charitable campaign will depend on many factors, including solicitation technique, ...
We develop a theory of charitable giving in which donors feel social pressure from a direct solicita...
This dissertation presents three experimental studies with an emphasis on peer influence in people’s...
This study theoretically and empirically examines altruistic and joyof- giving motivations underlyin...
This paper presents a model in which anonymous charitable donations are ratio-nalized by two human t...
This is the author's post-print version of an article whose final and definitive form has been publi...
In this study we examine whether and why human and social resources increase charitable giving. Usin...
People often make charitable donations together with other people, including friends or romantic par...
Every year, 90% of Americans give money to charities. Is such generosity necessarily welfare enhanci...
While the effects of peers on charitable giving have been of considerable interest to social scienti...
Charity could do the most good if every dollar donated went to causes that produced the greatest wel...
The critical research question pondered in this paper is whether donation intentions can be predicte...