This paper draws on the article 'Forensic Science, Scientific Validity and Reliability: Advice from America' (Ward, Edmond, Martire & Wortley, [2017] Crim LR 357), which considers the implications for English criminal courts of a major Report on forensic science from the President’s Council of Advisors on Science and Technology, defining the concept of “validity” and showing how a number of forensic sciences fall short of this standard. Our conference paper focuses on how expert evidence of questionable validity can be controlled by measures short of exclusion
There is an epistemic crisis in many areas of forensic science. This crisis emerged largely in respo...
Part I documents how courts have failed to faithfully apply Daubert’s criteria for scientific validi...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This paper draws on the article 'Forensic Science, Scientific Validity and Reliability: Advice from ...
In this article we review an important report produced by the US President’s Council of Advisors on ...
Through a series of judicial decisions and Practice Directions, the English courts have developed a ...
In recent decades, forensic science evidence has come to play an increasingly significant role in cr...
The utilization of an array of scientific techniques and technologies is now considered customary wi...
The Effectiveness of Forensic Science Research in progress for CRIJ 1301: Introduction to Criminal J...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Forensic science is a vital component of the criminal justice system. Undoubtedly, thousands of guil...
This article provides an explanation of the duties and responsibilities owed by forensic practitione...
The use of an array of scientific techniques and technologies is now considered customary within cri...
In Part I, I review the NRC’s stated reasons for giving the courts little or no role in improving fo...
Widespread practice across the majority of branches of forensic science uses analytical methods base...
There is an epistemic crisis in many areas of forensic science. This crisis emerged largely in respo...
Part I documents how courts have failed to faithfully apply Daubert’s criteria for scientific validi...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
This paper draws on the article 'Forensic Science, Scientific Validity and Reliability: Advice from ...
In this article we review an important report produced by the US President’s Council of Advisors on ...
Through a series of judicial decisions and Practice Directions, the English courts have developed a ...
In recent decades, forensic science evidence has come to play an increasingly significant role in cr...
The utilization of an array of scientific techniques and technologies is now considered customary wi...
The Effectiveness of Forensic Science Research in progress for CRIJ 1301: Introduction to Criminal J...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...
Forensic science is a vital component of the criminal justice system. Undoubtedly, thousands of guil...
This article provides an explanation of the duties and responsibilities owed by forensic practitione...
The use of an array of scientific techniques and technologies is now considered customary within cri...
In Part I, I review the NRC’s stated reasons for giving the courts little or no role in improving fo...
Widespread practice across the majority of branches of forensic science uses analytical methods base...
There is an epistemic crisis in many areas of forensic science. This crisis emerged largely in respo...
Part I documents how courts have failed to faithfully apply Daubert’s criteria for scientific validi...
This Article was prepared as a companion to the Fordham Law Review Reed Symposium on Forensic Expert...