We examine an infinitely repeated game between a principal, who has the formal authority to decide on a project, and a biased agent, who is privately informed about what projects are available. The optimal relational contract speaks to how power is earned, lost, and retained. It shows that entrenched power structures are consistent with optimal administration of power. And it provides new perspectives on why similar firms organize differently, even when those organizational differences lead to persistent differences in performance, and why established firms fail to exploit new opportunities, even when they are publicly observable
This article explores the link between productive relational contracts and corruption. Responsibilit...
This chapter examines power dynamics in organizations and their implications for the study of strate...
This paper considers the problem faced by n agents who repeatedly have to take a joint action, canno...
We examine an infinitely repeated game between a principal, who has the formal authority to decide o...
We explore the evolution of power within organizations. To this end, we examine an in\u85nitely repe...
This paper develops a moral hazard model whereby an agent exerts power to impute failure to other ag...
With more power, a manager can make more decisions or more important ones, and in this way have more...
Using reputation as a self-enforcing mechanism, a dynamic model with one principal and two agents is...
While cross-sector partnerships are sometimes depicted as a pragmatic problem solving arrangements d...
While cross-sector partnerships are sometimes depicted as a pragmatic problem solving arrangements d...
Abstract. This paper presents an analysis of the allocation of agenda-setting (or bargaining) power ...
International audienceEconomists have traditionally repudiated power from the theorization of the fi...
This paper analyses and compares optimal relational contracts be- tween a principal/firm and a set o...
I discuss the main theories on the role of power in organizations, emphasizing two questions: how sh...
We study bargaining between a fixed agenda-setter and responder over successive issues. If the respo...
This article explores the link between productive relational contracts and corruption. Responsibilit...
This chapter examines power dynamics in organizations and their implications for the study of strate...
This paper considers the problem faced by n agents who repeatedly have to take a joint action, canno...
We examine an infinitely repeated game between a principal, who has the formal authority to decide o...
We explore the evolution of power within organizations. To this end, we examine an in\u85nitely repe...
This paper develops a moral hazard model whereby an agent exerts power to impute failure to other ag...
With more power, a manager can make more decisions or more important ones, and in this way have more...
Using reputation as a self-enforcing mechanism, a dynamic model with one principal and two agents is...
While cross-sector partnerships are sometimes depicted as a pragmatic problem solving arrangements d...
While cross-sector partnerships are sometimes depicted as a pragmatic problem solving arrangements d...
Abstract. This paper presents an analysis of the allocation of agenda-setting (or bargaining) power ...
International audienceEconomists have traditionally repudiated power from the theorization of the fi...
This paper analyses and compares optimal relational contracts be- tween a principal/firm and a set o...
I discuss the main theories on the role of power in organizations, emphasizing two questions: how sh...
We study bargaining between a fixed agenda-setter and responder over successive issues. If the respo...
This article explores the link between productive relational contracts and corruption. Responsibilit...
This chapter examines power dynamics in organizations and their implications for the study of strate...
This paper considers the problem faced by n agents who repeatedly have to take a joint action, canno...