We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provision of incentives in a moral hazard context. Incentive contracts that are optimal when there are only selfish actors become inferior when some agents are concerned about fairness. Conversely, contracts that are doomed to fail when there are only selfish actors provide powerful incentives and become superior when there are also fair-minded players. These predictions are strongly supported by the results of a series of experiments. Furthermore, our results suggest that the existence of fair actors may be an important reason why many contracts are left deliberately incomplete.Incentive Contracts, Moral Hazard, Fairness, Reciprocity, Incomplete Contracts
In standard contract-theoretic models, the underlying assumption is that an agent is purely selfish...
While most market transactions are subject to strong incentives, transactions within firms are often...
This paper reports on a two-task principal-agent experiment in which only one task is contractible. ...
We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provision of incen...
Abstract: We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provisio...
Abstract: We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provisio...
We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on both the actual and the ...
Abstract: We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on both the actua...
Abstract: This paper examines how the presence of a non-negligible fraction of reciprocally fair act...
This paper examines how the presence of a non-negligible fraction of reciprocally fair actors change...
Abstract In this paper we present an axiomatic approach to characterize the optimal contracts, which...
We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on the actual and optimal c...
We analyze the classic moral hazard problem with the additional assumption that agents are inequity ...
In standard contract-theoretic models, the underlying assumption is that an agent is purely selfish...
While most market transactions are subject to strong incentives, transactions within firms are often...
This paper reports on a two-task principal-agent experiment in which only one task is contractible. ...
We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provision of incen...
Abstract: We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provisio...
Abstract: We show that concerns for fairness may have dramatic consequences for the optimal provisio...
We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on both the actual and the ...
Abstract: We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on both the actua...
Abstract: This paper examines how the presence of a non-negligible fraction of reciprocally fair act...
This paper examines how the presence of a non-negligible fraction of reciprocally fair actors change...
Abstract In this paper we present an axiomatic approach to characterize the optimal contracts, which...
We show experimentally that fairness concerns may have a decisive impact on the actual and optimal c...
We analyze the classic moral hazard problem with the additional assumption that agents are inequity ...
In standard contract-theoretic models, the underlying assumption is that an agent is purely selfish...
While most market transactions are subject to strong incentives, transactions within firms are often...
This paper reports on a two-task principal-agent experiment in which only one task is contractible. ...