Add to ORKGThis work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations that arise from related opinion targets and which are common in task-oriented meeting dialogs. We define the opinion frames and explain their interpretation. Additionally we present an annotation scheme that realizes the opinion frames and via human annotation studies, we show that these can be reliably identified
We present a set of annotations of hierarchical topic segmentations and action item subdialogues ...
Fine-grained opinion analysis methods often make use of linguistic features but typically do not tak...
Discourse information is difficult to represent and annotate. Among the major frameworks for annotat...
This work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations which arise fr...
Opinion analysis deals with subjective phenomena such as judgments, evaluations, feelings, emotions,...
This paper analyzes opinion categories like Sentiment and Arguing in meetings. We first annotate the...
This paper applies the categories from an opinion annotation scheme developed for monologue text to ...
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken...
In this paper, we introduce a corpus of consumer reviews from the rateitall and the eopinions websit...
This paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus exploring the im-pact of...
International audienceThis paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus th...
This paper proposes a new task in argument mining in online debates. The task includes three annotat...
Existing discourse formalisms use different taxonomies of discourse relations, which require expert ...
International audienceIn order to analyse what happens in dia- logue it is insufficient to consider ...
[contribution to the panel Nonveridicality, evaluation and coherence relations, organized by Taboada...
We present a set of annotations of hierarchical topic segmentations and action item subdialogues ...
Fine-grained opinion analysis methods often make use of linguistic features but typically do not tak...
Discourse information is difficult to represent and annotate. Among the major frameworks for annotat...
This work proposes opinion frames as a representation of discourse-level associations which arise fr...
Opinion analysis deals with subjective phenomena such as judgments, evaluations, feelings, emotions,...
This paper analyzes opinion categories like Sentiment and Arguing in meetings. We first annotate the...
This paper applies the categories from an opinion annotation scheme developed for monologue text to ...
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken...
In this paper, we introduce a corpus of consumer reviews from the rateitall and the eopinions websit...
This paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus exploring the im-pact of...
International audienceThis paper describes the CASOAR corpus, the first manually annotated corpus th...
This paper proposes a new task in argument mining in online debates. The task includes three annotat...
Existing discourse formalisms use different taxonomies of discourse relations, which require expert ...
International audienceIn order to analyse what happens in dia- logue it is insufficient to consider ...
[contribution to the panel Nonveridicality, evaluation and coherence relations, organized by Taboada...
We present a set of annotations of hierarchical topic segmentations and action item subdialogues ...
Fine-grained opinion analysis methods often make use of linguistic features but typically do not tak...
Discourse information is difficult to represent and annotate. Among the major frameworks for annotat...