Add to ORKGNear the end of his life, Hans Kelsen did away with the conception of the Basic Norm which he had defended so vigorously throughout his career and formulated a new version which was less well suited to his objective of demonstrating that law is genuinely scientific. Why did he do this? This short essay suggests an answer: that his final version of the Basic Norm followed logically from his understanding of how legal norms connect with human volition
This article aims to evaluate the relations between law and logic concerning the particular aspect o...
The article analyses Hans Kelsen's legal doctrine namely its ontological component. The question of ...
Following paper is concerned with the problem of Is/Ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of ...
The aim of this paper is to examine whether and how the idea of the Basic Norm (Grundnorm), which pl...
In the following paper, I compare Kelsen’s model, according to which positive Law is understood as a...
This article focuses on issues relating to legal normativity, emphasizing the way these matters have...
The treatise is concerned with the source-—the “Grund”--of the bindingness of law. I contend, first,...
Kelsen advanced a sophisticated naturalist conception of intention and adumbrated a methodological s...
Hans Kelsen veljavnost postavljenega pravnega reda ter vprašanje, ali določena pravna norma zavezuje...
For decades, sociologists have employed the concept of social norms to explain how society shapes in...
Brian Bix discusses questions of legal normativity, arguing (1) that Hans Kelsen’s theory of the bas...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
In this article I survey Foucault’s remarks on norms and normalisation from across his oeuvre, with ...
This article proposes an interpretation of the status of the Grundnorm in Hans Kelsen’s legal theory...
The first question that confronts the doctrine of natural law is: how can social norms be ascertaine...
This article aims to evaluate the relations between law and logic concerning the particular aspect o...
The article analyses Hans Kelsen's legal doctrine namely its ontological component. The question of ...
Following paper is concerned with the problem of Is/Ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of ...
The aim of this paper is to examine whether and how the idea of the Basic Norm (Grundnorm), which pl...
In the following paper, I compare Kelsen’s model, according to which positive Law is understood as a...
This article focuses on issues relating to legal normativity, emphasizing the way these matters have...
The treatise is concerned with the source-—the “Grund”--of the bindingness of law. I contend, first,...
Kelsen advanced a sophisticated naturalist conception of intention and adumbrated a methodological s...
Hans Kelsen veljavnost postavljenega pravnega reda ter vprašanje, ali določena pravna norma zavezuje...
For decades, sociologists have employed the concept of social norms to explain how society shapes in...
Brian Bix discusses questions of legal normativity, arguing (1) that Hans Kelsen’s theory of the bas...
Normativity is what gives reasons their force, makes words meaningful, and makes rules and laws bind...
In this article I survey Foucault’s remarks on norms and normalisation from across his oeuvre, with ...
This article proposes an interpretation of the status of the Grundnorm in Hans Kelsen’s legal theory...
The first question that confronts the doctrine of natural law is: how can social norms be ascertaine...
This article aims to evaluate the relations between law and logic concerning the particular aspect o...
The article analyses Hans Kelsen's legal doctrine namely its ontological component. The question of ...
Following paper is concerned with the problem of Is/Ought dichotomy in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of ...